FLYU vs. CIFG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FLYU is passively managed, while CIFG is actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.

Performance

FLYU vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -11.61% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 96.56% return.

FLYU

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 23.11%
• YTD: -11.61%
• 6M: -15.72%
• 1Y: 12.48%
• 3Y*: 9.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFG

• 1D: -3.87%
• 1M: 42.24%
• YTD: 96.56%
• 6M: 67.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYU vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	-11.61%	6.44%
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	96.56%	-32.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYU and CIFG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

FLYU vs. CIFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYU

FLYU Risk / Return Rank: 13
FLYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FLYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FLYU Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FLYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FLYU Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CIFG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYU vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLYU	CIFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.50	—	—

Drawdowns

FLYU vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFG drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and CIFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLYU	CIFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.00%	-71.71%	+2.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.88%	-10.44%	-19.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.54%	-35.54%	+9.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLYU	CIFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.93%	205.93%	-131.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.22%	205.93%	-122.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.22%	205.93%	-122.71%

FLYU vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLYU vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLYU nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLYU and CIFG in my portfolio?

FLYU and CIFG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLYU or CIFG?

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLYU or CIFG?

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FLYU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLYU or CIFG?

FLYU and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FLYU and CIFG?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYU and 0.75% for CIFG.