FLYU vs. BNO
FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FLYU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLYU returned 0.98%/yr vs 20.31%/yr for BNO. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.
Performance
FLYU vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -14.35% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return.
FLYU
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -14.35%
- 1Y
- -4.05%
- 3Y*
- 0.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.94%
BNO
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 27.00%
- 6M
- 52.90%
- YTD
- 77.90%
- 1Y
- 62.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 20.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.13M | $97.34M | $147.52M | |
| $41.17K | $39.32K | $61.70K |
FLYU vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | -14.35% | -2.29% | 33.00% | 111.16% | -19.09% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 77.90% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | -15.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYU and BNO is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022 | -0.04 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FLYU and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.42, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLYU vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
FLYU
BNO
FLYU vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLYU | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.24 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 1.70 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 5.15 | -5.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLYU vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYU | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.00% | -87.06% | +18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.33% | -34.46% | -17.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.00% | -34.46% | -34.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.06% | -16.21% | -15.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.65% | -39.99% | +13.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.23% | 11.86% | +14.37% |
Volatility
FLYU vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) has a higher volatility of 21.04% compared to United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) at 17.47%. This indicates that FLYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLYU | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.04% | 17.47% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.81% | 40.96% | +20.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.03% | 44.54% | +31.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.98% | 36.41% | +46.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.98% | 36.98% | +46.00% |
FLYU vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLYU vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLYU nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLYU and BNO have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLYU has higher volatility (21.04%) compared to BNO (17.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYU dropped -69.00% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 3-year performance, BNO leads with 20.31% vs 0.98% for FLYU. On fees, FLYU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNO has been the lower-risk option at 17.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BNO has performed better with a 20.31% return vs 0.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLYU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.
FLYU and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FLYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. FLYU tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: REX and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYU and 1.00% for BNO.
BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLYU and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer