FLYD vs. BNKD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds from REX - FLYD tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index while BNKD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLYD returned -50.80% vs -69.49% for BNKD. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

FLYD vs. BNKD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a -35.79% return, which is significantly higher than BNKD's -47.45% return.

FLYD

• 1D: -4.90%
• 1M: -5.05%
• 6M: -41.66%
• YTD: -35.79%
• 1Y: -50.80%
• 3Y*: -55.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -63.67%

BNKD

• 1D: -4.14%
• 1M: -14.63%
• 6M: -40.41%
• YTD: -47.45%
• 1Y: -69.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -65.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	$13.59K	$10.52K	$9.72K
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	$99.59K	$120.72K	$126.93K

FLYD vs. BNKD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-35.79%	-49.15%
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-47.45%	-59.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYD and BNKD is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.65

The correlation between FLYD and BNKD shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLYD vs. BNKD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLYD	BNKD
Consumer Cyclical	50.0%	-
Industrials	25.5%	-
Technology	17.1%	-
Communication Services	7.4%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FLYD vs. BNKD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLYD

FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 3
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

BNKD

BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 0
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLYD vs. BNKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLYD	BNKD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	-1.17	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.71	-2.31	+1.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	0.76	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	-0.99	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.66	-1.59	-0.07

FLYD vs. BNKD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYD Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is higher than the BNKD Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYD and BNKD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLYD vs. BNKD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -98.52%, which is greater than BNKD's maximum drawdown of -89.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and BNKD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLYD	BNKD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.52%	-89.67%	-8.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.09%	-70.39%	+13.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-94.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.52%	-89.67%	-8.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.66%	-66.59%	-17.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.58%	43.77%	-13.19%

Volatility

FLYD vs. BNKD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 22.74% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) at 16.93%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLYD	BNKD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.74%	16.93%	+5.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.36%	47.31%	+17.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.85%	59.67%	+17.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.52%	72.91%	+10.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.52%	72.91%	+10.61%

FLYD vs. BNKD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLYD and BNKD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

FLYD vs. BNKD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLYD nor BNKD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLYD and BNKD in my portfolio?

FLYD and BNKD have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLYD or BNKD?

FLYD has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to BNKD (16.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYD dropped -98.52% vs BNKD's -89.67%.

Which ETF is better, FLYD or BNKD?

On 1-year performance, FLYD leads with -50.80% vs -69.49% for BNKD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BNKD has been the lower-risk option at 16.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLYD or BNKD?

Over the 1-year period, FLYD has performed better with a -50.80% return vs -69.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLYD or BNKD?

FLYD and BNKD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLYD or BNKD?

FLYD and BNKD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FLYD and BNKD?

FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while BNKD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.