FLYD vs. CEPI
FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLYD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while CEPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. FLYD is passively managed, while CEPI is actively managed. Over the past year, FLYD returned -48.77% vs 20.69% for CEPI. Their -0.54 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLYD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CEPI.
Performance
FLYD vs. CEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a -29.08% return, which is significantly lower than CEPI's 15.15% return.
FLYD
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- 6M
- -35.29%
- YTD
- -29.08%
- 1Y
- -48.77%
- 3Y*
- -52.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -62.88%
CEPI
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 12.02%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 20.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.21M | $1.33M | $1.59M | |
| $95.69K | $124.77K | $139.75K |
FLYD vs. CEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -29.08% | -60.42% | 13.67% |
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 15.15% | 10.75% | -7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYD and CEPI is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | -0.54 |
The correlation between FLYD and CEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.54 to -0.45 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLYD vs. CEPI — Risk / Return Rank
FLYD
CEPI
FLYD vs. CEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLYD | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.12 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 0.71 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 1.66 | -3.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLYD vs. CEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -98.49%, which is greater than CEPI's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and CEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYD | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.49% | -29.48% | -69.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.11% | -22.47% | -33.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.36% | -7.59% | -90.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.63% | -8.24% | -75.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.18% | 9.65% | +20.53% |
Volatility
FLYD vs. CEPI - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 21.84% compared to REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) at 11.58%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLYD | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.84% | 11.58% | +10.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.55% | 23.76% | +40.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.98% | 29.53% | +47.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.54% | 31.91% | +51.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.54% | 31.91% | +51.63% |
FLYD vs. CEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLYD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CEPI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLYD vs. CEPI - Dividend Comparison
FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 45.59% | 50.78% |
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLYD and CEPI have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLYD has higher volatility (21.84%) compared to CEPI (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYD dropped -98.49% vs CEPI's -29.48%.
On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 20.69% vs -48.77% for FLYD. On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, CEPI has been the lower-risk option at 11.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 20.69% return vs -48.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FLYD.
CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 45.59%, compared with 0.00% for FLYD.
FLYD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CEPI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYD and 0.85% for CEPI.
CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLYD and CEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer