FLTW vs. LVHD
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD).
FLTW and LVHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLTW is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. LVHD is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. It was launched on Dec 29, 2015. Both FLTW and LVHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLTW vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLTW vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | 13.05% | 32.00% | 16.68% | 30.05% | -27.51% | 29.46% | 29.77% | 31.23% | -9.32% | -1.25% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 6.73% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 22.91% | -5.58% | 4.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTW achieves a 13.05% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 6.73% return.
FLTW
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- 13.05%
- 6M
- 18.97%
- 1Y
- 60.86%
- 3Y*
- 25.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLTW vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTW has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLTW vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
FLTW
LVHD
FLTW vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLTW | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 0.63 | +1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | 0.95 | +1.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.13 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 0.85 | +3.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.28 | 3.03 | +13.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLTW | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 0.63 | +1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.59 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.57 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTW and LVHD is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLTW vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
FLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than LVHD's 3.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | 2.22% | 2.51% | 1.89% | 2.85% | 3.16% | 2.31% | 2.14% | 3.00% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 3.20% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
Drawdowns
FLTW vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTW drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTW and LVHD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTW | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.00% | -37.32% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.81% | -8.38% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.00% | -16.75% | -21.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -4.83% | -2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -4.05% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 2.39% | +1.50% |
Volatility
FLTW vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a higher volatility of 10.06% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.77%. This indicates that FLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLTW | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.06% | 2.77% | +7.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.45% | 6.49% | +11.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.53% | 11.99% | +15.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 12.87% | +9.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 15.49% | +5.81% |