FLTR vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. FLTR is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. FLTR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

FLTR vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLTR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: 6.10%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: 3.51%

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTR vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	1.33%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

FLTR vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTR vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLTR	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.77	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	12.78	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	16.96	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	101.23	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLTR	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	—	—

Drawdowns

FLTR vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLTR	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.84%	0.00%	-17.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-3.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.67%	0.00%	-0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLTR	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.62%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79%	0.00%	+0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.13%	0.00%	+2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.00%	0.00%	+5.00%

FLTR vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLTR vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.73%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FLTR or QCON?

On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLTR or QCON?

FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLTR or QCON?

FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between FLTR and QCON?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FLTR and 0.32% for QCON.