FLTR vs. HYG
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG).
FLTR and HYG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011. HYG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2007. Both FLTR and HYG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLTR or HYG.
Key characteristics
| FLTR | HYG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.44% | 8.90% |
| 1Y Return | 7.68% | 14.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.81% | 2.95% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.39% | 3.68% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.70% | 4.01% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 7.29 | 3.25 |
| Sortino Ratio | 11.81 | 5.16 |
| Omega Ratio | 3.74 | 1.65 |
| Calmar Ratio | 10.37 | 2.48 |
| Martin Ratio | 114.30 | 25.18 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.07% | 0.61% |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.06% | 4.74% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.84% | -34.24% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and HYG is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLTR vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than HYG's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTR has underperformed HYG with an annualized return of 2.70%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.01% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLTR vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLTR vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLTR vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, less than HYG's 6.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 6.11% | 6.08% | 2.30% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.65% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.34% | 5.75% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% | 5.69% | 6.10% |
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and HYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLTR vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) is 0.27%, while iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that FLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.