PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTKX vs. FKDNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTKX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTKX achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than FKDNX's 13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTKX has underperformed FKDNX with an annualized return of 11.36%, while FKDNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.38% annualized return.


FLTKX

1D
0.45%
1M
4.97%
YTD
11.85%
6M
13.14%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
11.36%

FKDNX

1D
0.42%
1M
7.25%
YTD
13.49%
6M
12.49%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
18.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTKX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTKX
Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund
11.85%21.87%16.05%19.58%-17.27%17.56%16.18%22.67%-7.16%17.32%
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
13.49%18.59%30.57%44.42%-40.30%12.53%57.68%36.36%2.85%39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTKX and FKDNX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.82

The correlation between FLTKX and FKDNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTKX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTKX
FLTKX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FLTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FKDNX
FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTKX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLTKXFKDNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

1.55

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

2.07

+1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.27

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.54

+1.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.64

4.79

+8.86

FLTKX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTKX and FKDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLTKXFKDNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.55

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.44

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.75

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.67

+0.01

Drawdowns

FLTKX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTKX drawdown since its inception was -35.72%, smaller than the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTKX and FKDNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTKXFKDNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.72%

-51.63%

+15.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-20.49%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-26.23%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.72%

-48.28%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.72%

-48.28%

+12.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-11.25%

+4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

6.57%

-4.42%

Volatility

FLTKX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) is 3.43%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that FLTKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTKXFKDNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

4.76%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

15.85%

-6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

20.38%

-8.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

26.21%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

24.61%

-7.94%

FLTKX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTKX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLTKX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

FLTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, less than FKDNX's 9.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
9.84%11.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.43%0.00%0.74%2.92%1.77%3.55%2.46%
FLTKX
Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund
5.24%5.86%2.70%2.31%4.02%19.28%2.35%2.08%3.98%0.54%1.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTKX and FKDNX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKDNX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FLTKX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTKX dropped -35.72% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.

FLTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTKX and FKDNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer