PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTB vs. STOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTB vs. STOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than STOT's 1.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLTB having a 2.47% annualized return and STOT not far behind at 2.44%.


FLTB

1D
0.03%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.18%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
2.47%

STOT

1D
0.07%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
2.82%
10Y*
2.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTB vs. STOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
0.84%6.60%5.14%5.94%-5.88%-1.20%5.57%5.87%1.06%2.10%
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
1.05%5.56%5.26%6.39%-3.75%0.27%2.43%4.40%0.95%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTB and STOT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2016

0.42

The correlation between FLTB and STOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLTB vs. STOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLTB
STOT

Technology

0.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FLTB
0.0%
STOT

-

Financial Services

FLTB
0.0%
STOT

-

Basic Materials

FLTB

-

STOT

-

Communication Services

FLTB

-

STOT
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FLTB

-

STOT

-

Consumer Defensive

FLTB

-

STOT

-

Energy

FLTB

-

STOT

-

Healthcare

FLTB

-

STOT

-

Industrials

FLTB

-

STOT

-

Real Estate

FLTB

-

STOT

-

Utilities

FLTB

-

STOT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTB vs. STOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTB
FLTB Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FLTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

STOT
STOT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
STOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
STOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTB vs. STOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLTBSTOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.78

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

5.46

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

23.85

-11.62

FLTB vs. STOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the STOT Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTB and STOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLTBSTOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

3.78

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.64

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

1.11

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.12

-0.28

Drawdowns

FLTB vs. STOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, which is greater than STOT's maximum drawdown of -6.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and STOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTBSTOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-6.07%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.52%

-0.76%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.52%

-0.76%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.26%

-6.07%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.37%

-6.07%

-3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-0.84%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.18%

+0.18%

Volatility

FLTB vs. STOT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) at 0.33%. This indicates that FLTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTBSTOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.33%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

0.84%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13%

1.11%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

1.73%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.94%

2.20%

+0.74%

FLTB vs. STOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than STOT's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLTB vs. STOT - Dividend Comparison

FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than STOT's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
4.36%4.31%4.11%3.20%1.63%0.89%1.56%2.67%2.50%1.78%1.59%1.63%
STOT
State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF
4.41%4.52%5.10%4.53%2.54%1.76%1.66%2.61%2.50%1.95%2.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTB and STOT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLTB has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to STOT (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTB dropped -9.37% vs STOT's -6.07%.

On 10-year performance, FLTB leads with 2.47% vs 2.44% for STOT. On fees, FLTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, STOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FLTB has performed better with a 2.47% return vs 2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for STOT.

STOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 4.36% for FLTB.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLTB and 0.45% for STOT.

STOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTB and STOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer