FLSW vs. PSCC
FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) and PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLSW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLSW returned 6.39%/yr vs -0.17%/yr for PSCC. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLSW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCC.
Performance
FLSW vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than PSCC's 7.32% return.
FLSW
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 11.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCC
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- -2.67%
- 3Y*
- -0.78%
- 5Y*
- -0.17%
- 10Y*
- 6.33%
FLSW vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 1.74% | 32.92% | -1.77% | 16.79% | -18.14% | 20.82% | 13.25% | 31.66% | -7.85% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 7.32% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSW and PSCC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018 | 0.43 |
FLSW vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLSW
PSCC
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
FLSW
PSCC
-
Financial Services
FLSW
PSCC
-
Consumer Defensive
FLSW
PSCC
Industrials
FLSW
PSCC
Basic Materials
FLSW
PSCC
Consumer Cyclical
FLSW
PSCC
Real Estate
FLSW
PSCC
-
Communication Services
FLSW
PSCC
-
Technology
FLSW
PSCC
-
Utilities
FLSW
PSCC
-
Energy
FLSW
-
PSCC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLSW vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank
FLSW
PSCC
FLSW vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLSW | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.99 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | -0.18 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | -0.31 | +3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLSW | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | -0.16 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | -0.01 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
FLSW vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, smaller than the maximum PSCC drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and PSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLSW | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -33.61% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -15.17% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -23.36% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.16% | -23.36% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.36% | -16.21% | +9.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -5.98% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 8.70% | -4.54% |
Volatility
FLSW vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) is 4.10%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that FLSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLSW | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 4.66% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.28% | 10.79% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 16.50% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 18.24% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 19.29% | -2.40% |
FLSW vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLSW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLSW vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, which matches PSCC's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.08% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 2.07% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLSW and PSCC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to FLSW (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSW dropped -28.16% vs PSCC's -33.61%.
On 5-year performance, FLSW leads with 6.39% vs -0.17% for PSCC. On fees, FLSW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLSW has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLSW has performed better with a 6.39% return vs -0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLSW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
FLSW and PSCC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.08%.
FLSW is categorized as Europe Equities, while PSCC is Consumer Staples Equities. FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLSW and 0.29% for PSCC.
FLSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLSW and PSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer