FLSP vs. FLCH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FLSP (Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. FLSP is actively managed, while FLCH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLSP returned 8.08%/yr vs -4.99%/yr for FLCH. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLSP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

FLSP vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSP achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -11.65% return.

FLSP

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 0.58%
• 6M: 3.31%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 1Y: 19.30%
• 3Y*: 9.94%
• 5Y*: 8.08%
• 10Y*: —

FLCH

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -3.67%
• 6M: -17.28%
• YTD: -11.65%
• 1Y: -1.70%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: -4.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSP vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF	3.20%	15.56%	11.75%	3.14%	0.44%	11.44%	-15.19%	0.90%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-11.65%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSP and FLCH is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2019	0.03

Return for Risk

FLSP vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSP

FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 87
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 8
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSP vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLSP	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	-0.09	+2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	0.01	+3.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.00	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.81	-0.08	+4.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.40	-0.18	+14.58

FLSP vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSP Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSP and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLSP vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSP drawdown since its inception was -22.75%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSP and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLSP	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.75%	-62.09%	+39.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.03%	-21.48%	+17.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.69%	-25.43%	+18.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.52%	-53.29%	+43.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-37.72%	+37.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-30.60%	+24.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	9.46%	-8.12%

Volatility

FLSP vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) is 2.53%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that FLSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLSP	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	5.45%	-2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.84%	13.87%	-7.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.84%	19.59%	-10.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.37%	29.57%	-16.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.45%	27.81%	-14.36%

FLSP vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLSP vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than FLCH's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.45%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF	2.57%	2.65%	1.18%	1.19%	2.18%	1.19%	8.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLSP and FLCH in my portfolio?

FLSP and FLCH have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLSP or FLCH?

FLCH has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to FLSP (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSP dropped -22.75% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

Which ETF is better, FLSP or FLCH?

On 5-year performance, FLSP leads with 8.08% vs -4.99% for FLCH. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLSP or FLCH?

Over the 5-year period, FLSP has performed better with a 8.08% return vs -4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLSP or FLCH?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FLSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLSP or FLCH?

FLSP has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.45% for FLCH.

What is the main difference between FLSP and FLCH?

FLSP is categorized as Long-Short, while FLCH is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FLSP and 0.19% for FLCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.