PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSA vs. SDEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLSA vs. SDEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLSA vs. SDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLSA
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
8.75%-7.15%-0.29%12.99%-3.58%35.72%3.73%9.46%2.95%
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
8.90%32.01%4.02%12.64%-21.53%2.11%-11.13%17.56%1.39%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLSA having a 8.75% return and SDEM slightly higher at 8.90%.


FLSA

1D
-0.33%
1M
8.11%
YTD
8.75%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
-0.42%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*

SDEM

1D
-0.11%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
8.90%
6M
18.29%
1Y
31.53%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
4.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLSA vs. SDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SDEM's 0.67% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLSA vs. SDEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSA
FLSA Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FLSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SDEM
SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSA vs. SDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSASDEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

2.07

-2.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.10

2.72

-2.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.40

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

3.33

-3.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.06

13.53

-13.59

FLSA vs. SDEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSA Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the SDEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSA and SDEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSASDEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

2.07

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.29

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.18

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between FLSA and SDEM is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLSA vs. SDEM - Dividend Comparison

FLSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than SDEM's 4.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLSA
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
3.69%4.01%3.01%3.09%1.90%1.95%2.16%3.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
4.92%5.27%7.28%7.50%8.86%8.14%6.30%6.47%6.55%5.01%5.06%6.14%

Drawdowns

FLSA vs. SDEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSA drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, smaller than the maximum SDEM drawdown of -47.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSA and SDEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSASDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.31%

-47.38%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-9.78%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.25%

-36.72%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.88%

-4.11%

-8.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

-20.98%

+8.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

2.41%

+3.89%

Volatility

FLSA vs. SDEM - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) at 6.59%. This indicates that FLSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLSASDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

6.59%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

10.36%

+1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.71%

15.29%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

17.35%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.53%

19.30%

+0.23%