FLS vs. XYL
FLS (Flowserve Corporation) and XYL (Xylem Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, FLS returned 7.87%/yr vs 10.95%/yr for XYL. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FLS vs. XYL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLS achieves a 15.63% return, which is significantly higher than XYL's -18.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FLS has underperformed XYL with an annualized return of 7.87%, while XYL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.95% annualized return.
FLS
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- 14.90%
- YTD
- 15.63%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 74.68%
- 3Y*
- 32.80%
- 5Y*
- 16.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
XYL
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- -18.34%
- 6M
- -19.77%
- 1Y
- -10.88%
- 3Y*
- 1.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
FLS vs. XYL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLS Flowserve Corporation | 15.63% | 22.45% | 41.88% | 37.32% | 3.08% | -15.08% | -23.85% | 33.66% | -8.20% | -11.19% |
XYL Xylem Inc. | -18.34% | 18.78% | 2.57% | 4.77% | -6.60% | 18.94% | 30.90% | 19.59% | -1.01% | 39.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLS and XYL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2011 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FLS and XYL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
FLS:
$10.29B
XYL:
$26.87B
FLS:
$2.72
XYL:
$4.02
FLS:
29.36
XYL:
27.44
FLS:
0.96
XYL:
1.73
FLS:
2.23
XYL:
3.86
FLS:
4.65
XYL:
2.45
FLS:
$4.65B
XYL:
$6.97B
FLS:
$1.62B
XYL:
$2.71B
FLS:
$654.46M
XYL:
$1.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLS vs. XYL — Risk / Return Rank
FLS
XYL
FLS vs. XYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Xylem Inc. (XYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLS | XYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.94 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | -0.36 | +2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.95 | -0.77 | +7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLS vs. XYL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLS drawdown since its inception was -77.36%, which is greater than XYL's maximum drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLS and XYL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLS | XYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.36% | -46.69% | -30.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.83% | -30.04% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.76% | -30.04% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.89% | -46.69% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.82% | -46.69% | -18.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.84% | -27.09% | +14.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.99% | -10.42% | -16.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.77% | 14.15% | -3.38% |
Volatility
FLS vs. XYL - Volatility Comparison
Flowserve Corporation (FLS) has a higher volatility of 11.94% compared to Xylem Inc. (XYL) at 5.86%. This indicates that FLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLS | XYL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.94% | 5.86% | +6.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.77% | 19.34% | +12.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.62% | 24.49% | +24.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.18% | 26.07% | +10.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.62% | 27.28% | +10.34% |
Dividends
FLS vs. XYL - Dividend Comparison
FLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than XYL's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLS Flowserve Corporation | 1.06% | 1.21% | 1.46% | 1.94% | 2.61% | 2.61% | 2.17% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 1.35% | 1.58% | 1.71% |
XYL Xylem Inc. | 1.50% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.15% | 1.09% | 0.93% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.26% | 1.06% | 1.25% | 1.54% |
Financials
FLS vs. XYL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowserve Corporation and Xylem Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FLS and XYL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLS has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to XYL (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLS dropped -77.36% vs XYL's -46.69%.
FLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLS and XYL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer