XYL vs. GWRS
XYL (Xylem Inc.) and GWRS (Global Water Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. XYL operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while GWRS operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, XYL returned 11.03%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for GWRS. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
XYL vs. GWRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XYL having a -13.48% return and GWRS slightly higher at -13.30%. Over the past 10 years, XYL has outperformed GWRS with an annualized return of 11.03%, while GWRS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.11% annualized return.
XYL
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- 6M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- -13.48%
- 1Y
- -16.66%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.95%
GWRS
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -15.74%
- YTD
- -13.30%
- 1Y
- -22.85%
- 3Y*
- -14.57%
- 5Y*
- -14.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $592.02K | $608.89K | $849.14K | |
XYL Xylem Inc. | $278.33M | $249.35M | $230.13M |
XYL vs. GWRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYL Xylem Inc. | -13.48% | 18.78% | 2.57% | 4.77% | -6.60% | 18.94% | 30.90% | 19.59% | -1.01% | 39.50% |
GWRS Global Water Resources, Inc. | -13.30% | -24.33% | -9.94% | 0.95% | -20.68% | 20.65% | 12.34% | 33.21% | 11.84% | 5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYL and GWRS is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
XYL:
$27.31B
GWRS:
$205.95M
XYL:
$4.17
GWRS:
$0.07
XYL:
28.03
GWRS:
99.46
XYL:
1.77
GWRS:
65.64
XYL:
4.17
GWRS:
3.52
XYL:
2.66
GWRS:
2.44
XYL:
$6.79B
GWRS:
$56.59M
XYL:
$2.62B
GWRS:
$16.24M
XYL:
$1.35B
GWRS:
$19.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYL vs. GWRS — Risk / Return Rank
XYL
GWRS
XYL vs. GWRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xylem Inc. (XYL) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XYL | GWRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.90 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.59 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | -0.94 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XYL vs. GWRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYL drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, smaller than the maximum GWRS drawdown of -63.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYL and GWRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYL | GWRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -63.38% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.04% | -38.17% | +8.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.04% | -48.36% | +18.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.69% | -63.38% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | -63.38% | +16.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.75% | -60.21% | +37.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -22.51% | +12.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.78% | 23.62% | -7.84% |
Volatility
XYL vs. GWRS - Volatility Comparison
Xylem Inc. (XYL) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) at 8.17%. This indicates that XYL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYL | GWRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 8.17% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.08% | 26.81% | -6.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.28% | 33.79% | -7.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.34% | 32.25% | -5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.41% | 33.61% | -6.20% |
Dividends
XYL vs. GWRS - Dividend Comparison
XYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than GWRS's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWRS Global Water Resources, Inc. | 4.24% | 3.60% | 2.62% | 2.28% | 2.22% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 2.18% | 2.81% | 2.94% | 1.90% | 0.00% |
XYL Xylem Inc. | 1.42% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.15% | 1.09% | 0.93% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.26% | 1.06% | 1.25% | 1.54% |
Financials
XYL vs. GWRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xylem Inc. and Global Water Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
XYL and GWRS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XYL has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to GWRS (8.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYL dropped -46.69% vs GWRS's -63.38%.
GWRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYL and GWRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer