PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLS vs. HURN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

FLS vs. HURN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLS vs. HURN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLS
Flowserve Corporation
6.27%22.45%41.88%37.32%3.08%-15.08%-23.85%33.66%-8.20%-11.19%
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
-26.27%39.15%20.88%41.60%45.49%-15.35%-14.22%33.93%26.85%-20.14%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLS:

$9.44B

HURN:

$2.28B

EPS

FLS:

$2.65

HURN:

$5.90

PE Ratio

FLS:

27.69

HURN:

21.61

PEG Ratio

FLS:

0.91

HURN:

0.83

PS Ratio

FLS:

2.03

HURN:

1.35

PB Ratio

FLS:

4.31

HURN:

4.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLS:

$4.73B

HURN:

$1.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLS:

$1.62B

HURN:

$385.94M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLS:

$691.59M

HURN:

$132.50M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLS achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than HURN's -26.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FLS has underperformed HURN with an annualized return of 7.39%, while HURN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.


FLS

1D
6.29%
1M
-16.71%
YTD
6.27%
6M
39.16%
1Y
52.63%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
7.39%

HURN

1D
1.13%
1M
-9.84%
YTD
-26.27%
6M
-13.14%
1Y
-11.13%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
19.75%
10Y*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLS vs. HURN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLS
FLS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

HURN
HURN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HURN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HURN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HURN Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
HURN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HURN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLS vs. HURN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSHURNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

-0.30

+1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

-0.18

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.97

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

-0.30

+2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.50

-0.79

+7.29

FLS vs. HURN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the HURN Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLS and HURN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSHURNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

-0.30

+1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.22

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.22

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between FLS and HURN is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLS vs. HURN - Dividend Comparison

FLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while HURN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLS
Flowserve Corporation
1.16%1.21%1.46%1.94%2.61%2.61%2.17%1.91%2.00%1.35%1.58%1.71%
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLS vs. HURN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLS drawdown since its inception was -77.36%, smaller than the maximum HURN drawdown of -85.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLS and HURN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSHURNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.36%

-85.60%

+8.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.63%

-35.14%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.03%

-35.14%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.82%

-53.61%

-11.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-31.30%

+11.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.06%

-32.24%

+5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.13%

13.10%

-4.97%

Volatility

FLS vs. HURN - Volatility Comparison

Flowserve Corporation (FLS) has a higher volatility of 14.44% compared to Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) at 10.42%. This indicates that FLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HURN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLSHURNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.44%

10.42%

+4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.40%

28.68%

+6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.94%

36.87%

+12.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.80%

33.86%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.10%

36.01%

+1.09%

Financials

FLS vs. HURN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowserve Corporation and Huron Consulting Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
1.22B
441.96M
(FLS) Total Revenue
(HURN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FLS vs. HURN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flowserve Corporation and Huron Consulting Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
34.8%
0
Portfolio components
FLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Flowserve Corporation reported a gross profit of 425.24M and revenue of 1.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

HURN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 441.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Flowserve Corporation reported an operating income of 15.88M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

HURN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported an operating income of 44.31M and revenue of 441.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

FLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Flowserve Corporation reported a net income of -29.00M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in a net margin of -2.4%.

HURN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a net income of 30.65M and revenue of 441.96M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.