FLS vs. HURN
FLS (Flowserve Corporation) and HURN (Huron Consulting Group Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — FLS in Specialty Industrial Machinery, HURN in Consulting Services. Over the past 10 years, FLS returned 7.87%/yr vs 4.75%/yr for HURN. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLS vs. HURN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLS achieves a 15.63% return, which is significantly higher than HURN's -44.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FLS has outperformed HURN with an annualized return of 7.87%, while HURN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.75% annualized return.
FLS
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- 14.90%
- YTD
- 15.63%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 74.68%
- 3Y*
- 32.80%
- 5Y*
- 16.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
HURN
- 1D
- 5.59%
- 1M
- -9.41%
- YTD
- -44.75%
- 6M
- -46.39%
- 1Y
- -28.63%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
FLS vs. HURN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLS Flowserve Corporation | 15.63% | 22.45% | 41.88% | 37.32% | 3.08% | -15.08% | -23.85% | 33.66% | -8.20% | -11.19% |
HURN Huron Consulting Group Inc. | -44.75% | 39.15% | 20.88% | 41.60% | 45.49% | -15.35% | -14.22% | 33.93% | 26.85% | -20.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLS and HURN is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2004 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FLS and HURN has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FLS:
$10.29B
HURN:
$1.66B
FLS:
$2.72
HURN:
$5.86
FLS:
29.36
HURN:
16.31
FLS:
0.96
HURN:
0.62
FLS:
2.23
HURN:
0.97
FLS:
4.65
HURN:
4.18
FLS:
$4.65B
HURN:
$1.74B
FLS:
$1.62B
HURN:
$405.21M
FLS:
$654.46M
HURN:
$204.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLS vs. HURN — Risk / Return Rank
FLS
HURN
FLS vs. HURN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLS | HURN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.89 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | -0.56 | +3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.95 | -1.35 | +8.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLS vs. HURN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLS drawdown since its inception was -77.36%, smaller than the maximum HURN drawdown of -85.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLS and HURN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLS | HURN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.36% | -85.60% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.83% | -51.24% | +21.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.76% | -51.24% | +12.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.89% | -51.24% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.82% | -53.61% | -11.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.84% | -48.52% | +35.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.99% | -32.28% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.77% | 21.26% | -10.49% |
Volatility
FLS vs. HURN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) is 11.94%, while Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) has a volatility of 19.09%. This indicates that FLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HURN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLS | HURN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.94% | 19.09% | -7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.77% | 35.63% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.62% | 40.97% | +7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.18% | 35.25% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.62% | 36.69% | +0.93% |
Dividends
FLS vs. HURN - Dividend Comparison
FLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while HURN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLS Flowserve Corporation | 1.06% | 1.21% | 1.46% | 1.94% | 2.61% | 2.61% | 2.17% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 1.35% | 1.58% | 1.71% |
HURN Huron Consulting Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FLS vs. HURN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowserve Corporation and Huron Consulting Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLS vs. HURN - Profitability Comparison
FLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flowserve Corporation reported a gross profit of 379.84M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.
HURN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 451.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flowserve Corporation reported an operating income of 119.43M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
HURN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported an operating income of 36.58M and revenue of 451.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
FLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flowserve Corporation reported a net income of 81.68M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.
HURN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a net income of 23.25M and revenue of 451.77M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLS and HURN have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HURN has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to FLS (11.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLS dropped -77.36% vs HURN's -85.60%.
FLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLS and HURN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer