FLS vs. COWZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLS (Flowserve Corporation) is a stock, while COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Over the past 5 years, FLS returned 16.66%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for COWZ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FLS vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLS achieves a 15.63% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 3.27% return.

FLS

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: 14.90%
• YTD: 15.63%
• 6M: 12.94%
• 1Y: 74.68%
• 3Y*: 32.80%
• 5Y*: 16.66%
• 10Y*: 7.87%

COWZ

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 15.76%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 9.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLS vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLS Flowserve Corporation	15.63%	22.45%	41.88%	37.32%	3.08%	-15.08%	-23.85%	33.66%	-8.20%	-11.19%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	3.27%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	42.57%	11.65%	23.41%	-10.05%	20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FLS and COWZ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between FLS and COWZ has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FLS vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLS

FLS Risk / Return Rank: 83
FLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FLS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FLS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 45
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 39
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLS vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLS	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.39	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	2.05	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.25	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.66	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.95	7.92	-0.96

FLS vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLS and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLS vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLS drawdown since its inception was -77.36%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLS and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLS	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.36%	-38.63%	-38.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.83%	-5.95%	-23.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.76%	-22.00%	-16.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.89%	-22.00%	-19.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.84%	-5.40%	-7.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.99%	-4.80%	-22.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.77%	2.00%	+8.77%

Volatility

FLS vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Flowserve Corporation (FLS) has a higher volatility of 11.94% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 3.97%. This indicates that FLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLS	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.94%	3.97%	+7.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.77%	7.53%	+24.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.62%	11.38%	+37.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.18%	17.64%	+18.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.62%	19.90%	+17.72%

Dividends

FLS vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

FLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than COWZ's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	2.00%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%	0.00%
FLS Flowserve Corporation	1.06%	1.21%	1.46%	1.94%	2.61%	2.61%	2.17%	1.91%	2.00%	1.35%	1.58%	1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLS and COWZ in my portfolio?

FLS and COWZ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLS or COWZ?

FLS has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to COWZ (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLS dropped -77.36% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.