FLS vs. FLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Fluor Corporation (FLR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLS or FLR.
Correlation
The correlation between FLS and FLR is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FLS vs. FLR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLS:
2.06
FLR:
-0.12
FLS:
2.74
FLR:
0.11
FLS:
1.36
FLR:
1.02
FLS:
1.40
FLR:
-0.09
FLS:
11.59
FLR:
-0.53
FLS:
4.56%
FLR:
9.42%
FLS:
25.66%
FLR:
40.82%
FLS:
-77.36%
FLR:
-95.89%
FLS:
-4.76%
FLR:
-51.90%
Fundamentals
FLS:
$8.29B
FLR:
$6.82B
FLS:
$2.03
FLR:
$1.45
FLS:
31.08
FLR:
27.41
FLS:
1.89
FLR:
0.30
FLS:
$3.38B
FLR:
$12.06B
FLS:
$1.08B
FLR:
$365.00M
FLS:
$418.44M
FLR:
$326.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLS achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than FLR's -19.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FLS has outperformed FLR with an annualized return of 2.10%, while FLR has yielded a comparatively lower -2.89% annualized return.
FLS
9.70%
-0.63%
34.56%
49.55%
8.91%
2.10%
FLR
-19.40%
-21.12%
-17.74%
-5.56%
22.59%
-2.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLS vs. FLR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FLS
FLR
FLS vs. FLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLS vs. FLR - Dividend Comparison
FLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLS Flowserve Corporation | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.94% | 2.61% | 2.61% | 2.17% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 1.35% | 1.58% | 1.71% | 1.07% |
FLR Fluor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 1.39% |
Drawdowns
FLS vs. FLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLS drawdown since its inception was -77.36%, smaller than the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLS and FLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLS vs. FLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) is 8.93%, while Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a volatility of 21.70%. This indicates that FLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FLS vs. FLR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowserve Corporation and Fluor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities