PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLS vs. TAYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLS vs. TAYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLS achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly higher than TAYD's -10.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FLS has underperformed TAYD with an annualized return of 6.05%, while TAYD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.


FLS

1D
0.00%
1M
7.41%
YTD
9.03%
6M
5.54%
1Y
61.32%
3Y*
31.97%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
6.05%

TAYD

1D
-0.02%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-10.08%
6M
9.04%
1Y
40.98%
3Y*
39.86%
5Y*
34.68%
10Y*
12.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLS vs. TAYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLS
Flowserve Corporation
9.03%22.45%41.88%37.32%3.08%-15.08%-23.85%33.66%-8.20%-11.19%
TAYD
Taylor Devices, Inc.
-10.08%40.46%88.07%55.95%29.91%4.33%-0.38%-13.71%-9.24%-11.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FLS and TAYD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995

0.08

The correlation between FLS and TAYD shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

FLS:

$2.72

TAYD:

$4.95

PE Ratio

FLS:

27.69

TAYD:

10.62

PEG Ratio

FLS:

0.91

TAYD:

0.12

PS Ratio

FLS:

2.11

TAYD:

2.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLS:

$4.65B

TAYD:

$37.08M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLS:

$1.62B

TAYD:

$21.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLS:

$654.46M

TAYD:

$13.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLS vs. TAYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLS
FLS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TAYD
TAYD Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TAYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAYD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TAYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAYD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLS vs. TAYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSTAYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

0.91

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

2.15

+3.84

FLS vs. TAYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the TAYD Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLS and TAYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSTAYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

0.70

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.66

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.26

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.13

+0.12

Drawdowns

FLS vs. TAYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLS drawdown since its inception was -77.36%, roughly equal to the maximum TAYD drawdown of -74.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLS and TAYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSTAYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.36%

-74.52%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.83%

-45.06%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.76%

-52.65%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.03%

-52.65%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.82%

-66.49%

+1.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.81%

-41.56%

+23.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.01%

-37.29%

+10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.28%

19.15%

-8.87%

Volatility

FLS vs. TAYD - Volatility Comparison

Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) have volatilities of 12.81% and 12.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSTAYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.81%

12.50%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.50%

44.99%

-14.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.33%

58.50%

-10.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.00%

53.10%

-17.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.62%

46.22%

-8.60%

Dividends

FLS vs. TAYD - Dividend Comparison

FLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, while TAYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLS
Flowserve Corporation
1.13%1.21%1.46%1.94%2.61%2.61%2.17%1.91%2.00%1.35%1.58%1.71%
TAYD
Taylor Devices, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FLS vs. TAYD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowserve Corporation and Taylor Devices, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.07B
0
(FLS) Total Revenue
(TAYD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FLS and TAYD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLS has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to TAYD (12.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLS dropped -77.36% vs TAYD's -74.52%.

FLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLS and TAYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer