PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLS vs. TAYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

FLS vs. TAYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLS vs. TAYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLS
Flowserve Corporation
6.27%22.45%41.88%37.32%3.08%-15.08%-23.85%33.66%-8.20%-11.19%
TAYD
Taylor Devices, Inc.
-2.50%40.46%88.07%55.95%29.91%4.33%-0.38%-13.71%-9.24%-11.71%

Fundamentals

EPS

FLS:

$2.65

TAYD:

$4.22

PE Ratio

FLS:

27.69

TAYD:

13.50

PEG Ratio

FLS:

0.91

TAYD:

0.15

PS Ratio

FLS:

2.03

TAYD:

3.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLS:

$4.73B

TAYD:

$37.08M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLS:

$1.62B

TAYD:

$21.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLS:

$691.59M

TAYD:

$13.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLS achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than TAYD's -2.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FLS has underperformed TAYD with an annualized return of 7.39%, while TAYD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.63% annualized return.


FLS

1D
6.29%
1M
-16.71%
YTD
6.27%
6M
39.16%
1Y
52.63%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
7.39%

TAYD

1D
-20.93%
1M
-35.04%
YTD
-2.50%
6M
16.18%
1Y
76.63%
3Y*
41.69%
5Y*
37.78%
10Y*
14.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLS vs. TAYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLS
FLS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

TAYD
TAYD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TAYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAYD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TAYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAYD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLS vs. TAYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSTAYDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.35

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

1.89

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

1.95

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.50

7.93

-1.44

FLS vs. TAYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the TAYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLS and TAYD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSTAYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.35

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.73

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.32

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.14

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between FLS and TAYD is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLS vs. TAYD - Dividend Comparison

FLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while TAYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLS
Flowserve Corporation
1.16%1.21%1.46%1.94%2.61%2.61%2.17%1.91%2.00%1.35%1.58%1.71%
TAYD
Taylor Devices, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLS vs. TAYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLS drawdown since its inception was -77.36%, roughly equal to the maximum TAYD drawdown of -74.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLS and TAYD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSTAYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.36%

-74.52%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.63%

-36.63%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.03%

-52.65%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.82%

-66.49%

+1.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-36.63%

+16.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.06%

-37.27%

+10.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.13%

9.01%

-0.88%

Volatility

FLS vs. TAYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) is 14.44%, while Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) has a volatility of 27.78%. This indicates that FLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLSTAYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.44%

27.78%

-13.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.40%

45.13%

-9.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.94%

57.33%

-8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.80%

52.26%

-17.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.10%

45.86%

-8.76%

Financials

FLS vs. TAYD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowserve Corporation and Taylor Devices, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.22B
0
(FLS) Total Revenue
(TAYD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items