TAYD vs. DNOW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) and NOW Inc. (DNOW).

Performance

TAYD vs. DNOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) and NOW Inc. (DNOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TAYD vs. DNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TAYD Taylor Devices, Inc.	-2.50%	40.46%	88.07%	55.95%	29.91%	4.33%	-0.38%	-13.71%	-9.24%	-11.71%
DNOW NOW Inc.	-10.11%	1.84%	14.93%	-10.87%	48.71%	18.94%	-36.12%	-3.44%	5.53%	-46.12%

Fundamentals

EPS TAYD : $4.22 DNOW : -$0.73
PS Ratio TAYD : 3.78 DNOW : 0.52
Total Revenue (TTM) TAYD : $37.08M DNOW : $2.82B
Gross Profit (TTM) TAYD : $21.95M DNOW : $478.00M
EBITDA (TTM) TAYD : $13.00M DNOW : -$44.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAYD achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly higher than DNOW's -10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TAYD has outperformed DNOW with an annualized return of 14.63%, while DNOW has yielded a comparatively lower -3.88% annualized return.

TAYD

• 1D: -20.93%
• 1M: -35.04%
• YTD: -2.50%
• 6M: 16.18%
• 1Y: 76.63%
• 3Y*: 41.69%
• 5Y*: 37.78%
• 10Y*: 14.63%

DNOW

• 1D: 2.50%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: -10.11%
• 6M: -21.90%
• 1Y: -30.27%
• 3Y*: 2.22%
• 5Y*: 2.61%
• 10Y*: -3.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TAYD vs. DNOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAYD

TAYD Risk / Return Rank: 79
TAYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TAYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
TAYD Omega Ratio Rank: 76
TAYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TAYD Martin Ratio Rank: 85

DNOW

DNOW Risk / Return Rank: 12
DNOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
DNOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
DNOW Omega Ratio Rank: 15
DNOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
DNOW Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAYD vs. DNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) and NOW Inc. (DNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TAYD	DNOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	-0.68	+2.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	-0.71	+2.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.90	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	-0.84	+2.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.93	-1.68	+9.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TAYD vs. DNOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the DNOW Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAYD and DNOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TAYD	DNOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	-0.68	+2.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.06	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	-0.08	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	-0.16	+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between TAYD and DNOW is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TAYD vs. DNOW - Dividend Comparison

Neither TAYD nor DNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TAYD vs. DNOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAYD drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, smaller than the maximum DNOW drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAYD and DNOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAYD	DNOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.52%	-89.06%	+14.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.63%	-35.76%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.65%	-39.36%	-13.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.49%	-82.46%	+15.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.63%	-67.98%	+31.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.27%	-61.55%	+24.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.01%	17.92%	-8.91%

Volatility

TAYD vs. DNOW - Volatility Comparison

Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) has a higher volatility of 27.78% compared to NOW Inc. (DNOW) at 11.58%. This indicates that TAYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAYD	DNOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.78%	11.58%	+16.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.13%	34.39%	+10.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.33%	44.75%	+12.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.26%	44.19%	+8.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.86%	48.68%	-2.82%

Financials