PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HURN vs. BAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HURN vs. BAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HURN achieves a -44.75% return, which is significantly lower than BAH's -23.12% return. Over the past 10 years, HURN has underperformed BAH with an annualized return of 4.75%, while BAH has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.


HURN

1D
5.59%
1M
-9.41%
YTD
-44.75%
6M
-46.39%
1Y
-28.63%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
4.75%

BAH

1D
0.87%
1M
-18.20%
YTD
-23.12%
6M
-23.39%
1Y
-34.85%
3Y*
-14.27%
5Y*
-4.06%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HURN vs. BAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
-44.75%39.15%20.88%41.60%45.49%-15.35%-14.22%33.93%26.85%-20.14%
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
-23.12%-33.02%2.00%24.47%25.71%-1.04%24.46%60.16%20.21%7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HURN and BAH is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HURN:

$1.66B

BAH:

$7.71B

EPS

HURN:

$5.86

BAH:

$6.91

PE Ratio

HURN:

16.31

BAH:

9.25

PEG Ratio

HURN:

0.62

BAH:

0.27

PS Ratio

HURN:

0.97

BAH:

0.70

PB Ratio

HURN:

4.18

BAH:

6.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

HURN:

$1.74B

BAH:

$11.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HURN:

$405.21M

BAH:

$4.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

HURN:

$204.05M

BAH:

$1.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HURN vs. BAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HURN
HURN Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HURN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HURN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HURN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HURN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
HURN Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BAH
BAH Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAH Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAH Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HURN vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HURNBAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.85

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.80

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

-1.48

+0.13

HURN vs. BAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HURN Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is comparable to the BAH Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HURN and BAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HURN vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HURN drawdown since its inception was -85.60%, which is greater than BAH's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HURN and BAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HURNBAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.60%

-64.56%

-21.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.24%

-43.91%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.24%

-64.56%

+13.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.24%

-64.56%

+13.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.61%

-64.56%

+10.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.52%

-64.25%

+15.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.28%

-10.83%

-21.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.26%

23.56%

-2.30%

Volatility

HURN vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison

Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) has a higher volatility of 19.09% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) at 13.48%. This indicates that HURN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HURNBAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.09%

13.48%

+5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.63%

31.49%

+4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.97%

38.83%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.25%

31.30%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.69%

28.82%

+7.87%

Dividends

HURN vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison

HURN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
3.57%2.61%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HURN vs. BAH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Huron Consulting Group Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
451.77M
2.78B
(HURN) Total Revenue
(BAH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HURN vs. BAH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Huron Consulting Group Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
20.9%
Portfolio components
HURN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 451.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 581.00M and revenue of 2.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.

HURN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported an operating income of 36.58M and revenue of 451.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

BAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 263.00M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.

HURN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a net income of 23.25M and revenue of 451.77M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

BAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 205.00M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HURN and BAH have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HURN has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to BAH (13.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HURN dropped -85.60% vs BAH's -64.56%.

HURN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HURN and BAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer