HURN vs. FCN

In the year-to-date period, HURN achieves a 17.02% return, which is significantly higher than FCN's -0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, HURN has underperformed FCN with an annualized return of 5.83%, while FCN has yielded a comparatively higher 17.50% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HURN Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the FCN Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HURN and FCN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither HURN nor FCN has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum HURN drawdown since its inception was -85.60%, roughly equal to the maximum FCN drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HURN and FCN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) have volatilities of 13.81% and 14.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Huron Consulting Group Inc. and FTI Consulting, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.