PortfoliosLab logo
HURN vs. FCN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HURN and FCN is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HURN vs. FCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HURN:

2.13

FCN:

-0.98

Sortino Ratio

HURN:

3.37

FCN:

-1.13

Omega Ratio

HURN:

1.42

FCN:

0.82

Calmar Ratio

HURN:

3.24

FCN:

-0.76

Martin Ratio

HURN:

13.64

FCN:

-1.55

Ulcer Index

HURN:

5.10%

FCN:

16.68%

Daily Std Dev

HURN:

33.54%

FCN:

26.92%

Max Drawdown

HURN:

-85.60%

FCN:

-88.05%

Current Drawdown

HURN:

-3.36%

FCN:

-28.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HURN:

$2.55B

FCN:

$5.55B

EPS

HURN:

$6.65

FCN:

$7.31

PE Ratio

HURN:

22.26

FCN:

22.13

PEG Ratio

HURN:

1.52

FCN:

1.61

PS Ratio

HURN:

1.67

FCN:

1.51

PB Ratio

HURN:

5.11

FCN:

2.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

HURN:

$1.56B

FCN:

$3.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HURN:

$485.14M

FCN:

$1.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

HURN:

$214.21M

FCN:

$383.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HURN achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly higher than FCN's -13.54% return. Over the past 10 years, HURN has underperformed FCN with an annualized return of 8.88%, while FCN has yielded a comparatively higher 15.31% annualized return.


HURN

YTD

19.15%

1M

3.99%

6M

21.07%

1Y

70.96%

5Y*

30.55%

10Y*

8.88%

FCN

YTD

-13.54%

1M

0.16%

6M

-15.59%

1Y

-26.28%

5Y*

7.56%

10Y*

15.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HURN vs. FCN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HURN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HURN is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HURN is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HURN is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HURN is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HURN is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HURN is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FCN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCN is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCN is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCN is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCN is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCN is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCN is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HURN vs. FCN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HURN Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the FCN Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HURN and FCN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HURN vs. FCN - Dividend Comparison

Neither HURN nor FCN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HURN vs. FCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HURN drawdown since its inception was -85.60%, roughly equal to the maximum FCN drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HURN and FCN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HURN vs. FCN - Volatility Comparison

Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) at 5.89%. This indicates that HURN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HURN vs. FCN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Huron Consulting Group Inc. and FTI Consulting, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20212022202320242025
404.14M
898.28M
(HURN) Total Revenue
(FCN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HURN vs. FCN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Huron Consulting Group Inc. and FTI Consulting, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

26.0%28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%20212022202320242025
29.1%
32.2%
(HURN) Gross Margin
(FCN) Gross Margin
HURN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 117.65M and revenue of 404.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.1%.

FCN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 289.35M and revenue of 898.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.

HURN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported an operating income of 32.73M and revenue of 404.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

FCN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 78.71M and revenue of 898.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

HURN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a net income of 24.54M and revenue of 404.14M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

FCN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 61.82M and revenue of 898.28M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.