HURN vs. FCN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN).

Performance

HURN vs. FCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HURN vs. FCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HURN Huron Consulting Group Inc.	-25.84%	39.15%	20.88%	41.60%	45.49%	-15.35%	-14.22%	33.93%	26.85%	-20.14%
FCN FTI Consulting, Inc.	4.62%	-10.62%	-4.03%	25.41%	3.51%	37.33%	0.96%	66.06%	55.12%	-4.70%

Fundamentals

EPS HURN : $5.90 FCN : $12.42
PE Ratio HURN : 21.74 FCN : 14.39
PEG Ratio HURN : 0.83 FCN : 3.13
PS Ratio HURN : 1.36 FCN : 1.03
Total Revenue (TTM) HURN : $1.68B FCN : $3.79B
Gross Profit (TTM) HURN : $385.94M FCN : $1.22B
EBITDA (TTM) HURN : $132.50M FCN : $389.08M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HURN achieves a -25.84% return, which is significantly lower than FCN's 4.62% return. Over the past 10 years, HURN has underperformed FCN with an annualized return of 8.13%, while FCN has yielded a comparatively higher 17.50% annualized return.

HURN

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -11.23%
• YTD: -25.84%
• 6M: -13.14%
• 1Y: -12.40%
• 3Y*: 16.85%
• 5Y*: 19.89%
• 10Y*: 8.13%

FCN

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 8.99%
• YTD: 4.62%
• 6M: 10.97%
• 1Y: 8.90%
• 3Y*: -3.25%
• 5Y*: 4.68%
• 10Y*: 17.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HURN vs. FCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HURN

HURN Risk / Return Rank: 26
HURN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
HURN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
HURN Omega Ratio Rank: 23
HURN Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
HURN Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FCN

FCN Risk / Return Rank: 51
FCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FCN Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FCN Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HURN vs. FCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HURN	FCN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	0.35	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	0.66	-0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.09	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	0.60	-0.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	1.54	-2.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HURN vs. FCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HURN Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the FCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HURN and FCN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HURN	FCN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34	0.35	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.17	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.57	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.30	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between HURN and FCN is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HURN vs. FCN - Dividend Comparison

Neither HURN nor FCN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HURN vs. FCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HURN drawdown since its inception was -85.60%, roughly equal to the maximum FCN drawdown of -88.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HURN and FCN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HURN	FCN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.60%	-88.02%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.14%	-14.82%	-20.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.14%	-34.34%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.61%	-34.34%	-19.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.90%	-22.63%	-8.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.24%	-30.31%	-1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.24%	5.79%	+7.45%

Volatility

HURN vs. FCN - Volatility Comparison

Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) has a higher volatility of 9.91% compared to FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) at 6.77%. This indicates that HURN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HURN	FCN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.91%	6.77%	+3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.66%	20.38%	+8.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.87%	25.25%	+11.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.84%	28.48%	+5.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.00%	30.63%	+5.37%

Financials

HURN vs. FCN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Huron Consulting Group Inc. and FTI Consulting, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HURN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 441.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FCN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 307.67M and revenue of 990.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.

HURN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported an operating income of 44.31M and revenue of 441.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

FCN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 93.44M and revenue of 990.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

HURN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a net income of 30.65M and revenue of 441.96M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

FCN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 54.53M and revenue of 990.75M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.