PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HURN vs. FCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HURN vs. FCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HURN achieves a -47.67% return, which is significantly lower than FCN's -17.46% return. Over the past 10 years, HURN has underperformed FCN with an annualized return of 4.19%, while FCN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.36% annualized return.


HURN

1D
-0.09%
1M
-14.20%
YTD
-47.67%
6M
-49.45%
1Y
-31.53%
3Y*
2.52%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
4.19%

FCN

1D
-3.15%
1M
-8.50%
YTD
-17.46%
6M
-21.07%
1Y
-11.19%
3Y*
-9.18%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HURN vs. FCN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
-47.67%39.15%20.88%41.60%45.49%-15.35%-14.22%33.93%26.85%-20.14%
FCN
FTI Consulting, Inc.
-17.46%-10.62%-4.03%25.41%3.51%37.33%0.96%66.06%55.12%-4.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HURN and FCN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2004

0.36

The correlation between HURN and FCN shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

HURN:

$5.86

FCN:

$10.96

PE Ratio

HURN:

15.44

FCN:

12.86

PEG Ratio

HURN:

0.59

FCN:

2.36

PS Ratio

HURN:

0.92

FCN:

0.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

HURN:

$1.74B

FCN:

$3.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HURN:

$405.21M

FCN:

$1.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

HURN:

$204.05M

FCN:

$462.64M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HURN vs. FCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HURN
HURN Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HURN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HURN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HURN Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
HURN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
HURN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FCN
FCN Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCN Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCN Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HURN vs. FCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HURNFCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.95

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

-0.46

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

-1.32

-0.18

HURN vs. FCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HURN Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the FCN Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HURN and FCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HURN vs. FCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HURN drawdown since its inception was -85.60%, roughly equal to the maximum FCN drawdown of -88.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HURN and FCN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HURNFCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.60%

-88.02%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.24%

-24.61%

-26.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.24%

-38.96%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.24%

-38.96%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.61%

-38.96%

-14.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.24%

-38.96%

-12.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.28%

-30.30%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.04%

8.50%

+12.54%

Volatility

HURN vs. FCN - Volatility Comparison

Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) has a higher volatility of 18.08% compared to FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) at 7.35%. This indicates that HURN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HURNFCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.08%

7.35%

+10.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.12%

22.86%

+12.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.65%

27.51%

+13.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.17%

29.13%

+6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.66%

30.54%

+6.12%

Dividends

HURN vs. FCN - Dividend Comparison

Neither HURN nor FCN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

HURN vs. FCN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Huron Consulting Group Inc. and FTI Consulting, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
451.77M
983.35M
(HURN) Total Revenue
(FCN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HURN vs. FCN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Huron Consulting Group Inc. and FTI Consulting, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%202220232024202520260
31.2%
Portfolio components
HURN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 451.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FCN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a gross profit of 306.83M and revenue of 983.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.2%.

HURN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported an operating income of 36.58M and revenue of 451.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

FCN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.92M and revenue of 983.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.

HURN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huron Consulting Group Inc. reported a net income of 23.25M and revenue of 451.77M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

FCN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTI Consulting, Inc. reported a net income of 57.63M and revenue of 983.35M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HURN and FCN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HURN has higher volatility (18.08%) compared to FCN (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HURN dropped -85.60% vs FCN's -88.02%.

FCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HURN and FCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer