PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRN vs. BSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRN vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRN achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than BSCR's 1.27% return.


FLRN

1D
0.03%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.19%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
3.03%

BSCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.69%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRN vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
1.87%5.01%6.32%6.54%1.31%0.39%0.77%4.02%1.39%0.47%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%9.68%14.88%-2.63%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRN and BSCR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRN vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRN
FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRN vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRNBSCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.44

2.14

+1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.54

11.08

+10.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

130.06

46.99

+83.07

FLRN vs. BSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRN Sharpe Ratio is 7.18, which is higher than the BSCR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRN and BSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRNBSCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.18

4.31

+2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.50

0.35

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.59

-0.09

Drawdowns

FLRN vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRN drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum BSCR drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRN and BSCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRNBSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.64%

-17.26%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.23%

-0.42%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.43%

-2.41%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.16%

-14.87%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-3.35%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.10%

-0.06%

Volatility

FLRN vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) is 0.15%, while Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) has a volatility of 0.19%. This indicates that FLRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRNBSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

0.19%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.52%

0.59%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68%

1.08%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.69%

4.09%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

5.35%

-1.15%

FLRN vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLRN vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison

FLRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than BSCR's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%0.00%0.00%
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
4.51%4.89%5.67%5.68%1.95%0.39%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.64%1.06%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLRN and BSCR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCR has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to FLRN (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRN dropped -14.64% vs BSCR's -17.26%.

On 5-year performance, FLRN leads with 4.19% vs 1.41% for BSCR. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLRN has performed better with a 4.19% return vs 1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLRN.

FLRN has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 4.29% for BSCR.

FLRN tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y), while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLRN and 0.10% for BSCR.

FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.18 vs 4.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRN and BSCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer