PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRG vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRG vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 12.01% return.


FLRG

1D
0.15%
1M
3.94%
YTD
9.53%
6M
9.67%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*

VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRG vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
9.53%13.92%23.36%18.31%-10.98%29.36%9.53%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRG and VTI is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.95

The correlation between FLRG and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLRG vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLRG
VTI

Technology

34.7%
33.5%

Financial Services

12.3%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.0%

Communication Services

10.3%
10.3%

Healthcare

9.2%
9.2%

Industrials

7.7%
9.8%

Energy

4.8%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.7%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.4%

Utilities

1.2%
2.3%

Technology

FLRG
34.7%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

FLRG
12.3%
VTI
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FLRG
10.7%
VTI
10.0%

Communication Services

FLRG
10.3%
VTI
10.3%

Healthcare

FLRG
9.2%
VTI
9.2%

Industrials

FLRG
7.7%
VTI
9.8%

Energy

FLRG
4.8%
VTI
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

FLRG
4.6%
VTI
4.7%

Basic Materials

FLRG
2.5%
VTI
2.0%

Real Estate

FLRG
2.1%
VTI
2.4%

Utilities

FLRG
1.2%
VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRG vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRG
FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRG vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRGVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

2.48

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.81

3.37

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

3.44

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.31

15.88

-4.57

FLRG vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRG and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRGVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.48

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.75

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.51

+0.54

Drawdowns

FLRG vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRGVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-55.45%

+35.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-8.92%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-19.30%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.64%

-25.36%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-8.03%

+4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.93%

-0.12%

Volatility

FLRG vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) is 2.44%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that FLRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRGVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

2.86%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

9.11%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

12.15%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

17.40%

-2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

18.30%

-3.28%

FLRG vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRG vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.34%1.42%1.42%1.39%1.62%1.36%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLRG and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to FLRG (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRG dropped -19.64% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, FLRG leads with 13.32% vs 13.05% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FLRG has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLRG has performed better with a 13.32% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLRG.

FLRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

FLRG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. FLRG tracks Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLRG and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRG and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer