FLRG vs. DFAU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FLRG (Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF) and DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FLRG is passively managed, while DFAU is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLRG returned 12.04%/yr vs 12.66%/yr for DFAU. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FLRG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DFAU.

Performance

FLRG vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than DFAU's 12.63% return.

FLRG

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 2.45%
• 6M: 8.71%
• YTD: 11.12%
• 1Y: 18.61%
• 3Y*: 18.67%
• 5Y*: 12.04%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.55%

DFAU

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: 9.88%
• YTD: 12.63%
• 1Y: 24.32%
• 3Y*: 20.07%
• 5Y*: 12.66%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	$29.77M	$29.67M	$32.10M
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	$445.46K	$654.49K	$817.38K

FLRG vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	11.12%	13.92%	23.36%	18.31%	-10.98%	29.36%	3.41%
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	12.63%	16.78%	23.17%	24.79%	-16.99%	26.89%	4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRG and DFAU is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020	0.95

The correlation between FLRG and DFAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLRG vs. DFAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLRG	DFAU
Technology	37.5%	39.8%
Financial Services	12.1%	14.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	10.4%
Healthcare	9.7%	7.4%
Communication Services	9.2%	7.4%
Industrials	7.7%	9.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	3.9%
Energy	4.2%	3.2%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.0%	0.2%
Utilities	1.1%	2.4%

Return for Risk

FLRG vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLRG

FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 75
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

DFAU

DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 80
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLRG vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLRG	DFAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.90	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.61	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	2.82	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.89	12.20	-2.31

FLRG vs. DFAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the DFAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRG and DFAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLRG vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum DFAU drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and DFAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRG	DFAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.64%	-23.61%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-8.67%	+1.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-19.36%	+2.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.64%	-23.61%	+3.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.67%	-4.88%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	2.00%	-0.11%

Volatility

FLRG vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) is 2.61%, while Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that FLRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLRG	DFAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.61%	3.63%	-1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.19%	10.12%	-1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.59%	12.89%	-2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.21%	17.12%	-1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.92%	16.69%	-1.77%

FLRG vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLRG vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison

FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than DFAU's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	0.90%	0.95%	1.10%	1.29%	1.40%	1.00%	0.13%
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	1.36%	1.42%	1.42%	1.39%	1.62%	1.36%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLRG and DFAU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FLRG and DFAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLRG or DFAU?

DFAU has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to FLRG (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRG dropped -19.64% vs DFAU's -23.61%.

Which ETF is better, FLRG or DFAU?

On 5-year performance, DFAU leads with 12.66% vs 12.04% for FLRG. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FLRG has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLRG or DFAU?

Over the 5-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLRG or DFAU?

DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLRG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLRG or DFAU?

FLRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.90% for DFAU.

What is the main difference between FLRG and DFAU?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLRG and 0.12% for DFAU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.