PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQS vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQS vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQS achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.


FLQS

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.12%
YTD
6.14%
6M
5.99%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQS vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
6.14%5.04%8.34%21.28%-16.88%26.58%10.51%18.34%-5.86%7.41%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQS and USL is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.17

The correlation between FLQS and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLQS vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQS
USL

Technology

17.1%

-

Industrials

16.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.6%

-

Financial Services

12.6%
4.5%

Healthcare

9.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.8%

-

Real Estate

6.7%

-

Utilities

5.8%

-

Energy

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Communication Services

1.9%

-

Technology

FLQS
17.1%
USL

-

Industrials

FLQS
16.3%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLQS
15.6%
USL

-

Financial Services

FLQS
12.6%
USL
4.5%

Healthcare

FLQS
9.6%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

FLQS
7.8%
USL

-

Real Estate

FLQS
6.7%
USL

-

Utilities

FLQS
5.8%
USL

-

Energy

FLQS
4.6%
USL

-

Basic Materials

FLQS
2.1%
USL

-

Communication Services

FLQS
1.9%
USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQS vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQS vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQSUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

3.47

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

7.02

-2.47

FLQS vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQS Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQS and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQSUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

2.04

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.58

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.01

+0.37

Drawdowns

FLQS vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQSUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-89.06%

+46.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-16.76%

+7.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.12%

-23.33%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-33.82%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-38.16%

+36.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-61.46%

+53.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

8.27%

-5.22%

Volatility

FLQS vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) is 4.09%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that FLQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQSUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

10.53%

-6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

23.33%

-13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

28.54%

-13.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.24%

30.08%

-10.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.68%

32.35%

-10.67%

FLQS vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLQS vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.35%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQS and USL have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to FLQS (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQS dropped -42.16% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.41% vs 5.27% for FLQS. On fees, FLQS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FLQS has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLQS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

FLQS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

FLQS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLQS and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQS and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer