FLQS vs. JHSC
FLQS (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and JHSC (John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - FLQS tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index while JHSC tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQS returned 5.27%/yr vs 7.04%/yr for JHSC. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JHSC.
Performance
FLQS vs. JHSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLQS achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than JHSC's 11.55% return.
FLQS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- —
JHSC
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- —
FLQS vs. JHSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 6.14% | 5.04% | 8.34% | 21.28% | -16.88% | 26.58% | 10.51% | 18.34% | -5.86% | 4.75% |
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 11.55% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 20.77% | -14.65% | 19.55% | 11.60% | 24.43% | -12.50% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQS and JHSC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FLQS and JHSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLQS vs. JHSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLQS
JHSC
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
FLQS
JHSC
Industrials
FLQS
JHSC
Consumer Cyclical
FLQS
JHSC
Financial Services
FLQS
JHSC
Healthcare
FLQS
JHSC
Consumer Defensive
FLQS
JHSC
Real Estate
FLQS
JHSC
Utilities
FLQS
JHSC
Energy
FLQS
JHSC
Basic Materials
FLQS
JHSC
Communication Services
FLQS
JHSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLQS vs. JHSC — Risk / Return Rank
FLQS
JHSC
FLQS vs. JHSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLQS | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.26 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.51 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 8.69 | -4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLQS | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.49 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.35 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.39 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
FLQS vs. JHSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, roughly equal to the maximum JHSC drawdown of -42.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and JHSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLQS | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -42.66% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -9.63% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -25.16% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.05% | -25.21% | -2.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.80% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -7.78% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.78% | +0.27% |
Volatility
FLQS vs. JHSC - Volatility Comparison
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) have volatilities of 4.09% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLQS | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 4.16% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.26% | 11.11% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 16.27% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 20.15% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 22.21% | -0.53% |
FLQS vs. JHSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JHSC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLQS vs. JHSC - Dividend Comparison
FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than JHSC's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.75% | 1.40% | 0.95% | 1.20% | 1.41% | 1.27% | 1.02% |
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FLQS and JHSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JHSC has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to FLQS (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQS dropped -42.16% vs JHSC's -42.66%.
On 5-year performance, JHSC leads with 7.04% vs 5.27% for FLQS. On fees, FLQS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHSC has performed better with a 7.04% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLQS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHSC.
FLQS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.01% for JHSC.
FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLQS and 0.42% for JHSC.
JHSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLQS and JHSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer