PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQS vs. IVOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQS vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQS achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than IVOO's 14.13% return.


FLQS

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.12%
YTD
6.14%
6M
5.99%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*

IVOO

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.90%
YTD
14.13%
6M
14.37%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQS vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
6.14%5.04%8.34%21.28%-16.88%26.58%10.51%18.34%-5.86%7.41%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.13%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%11.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQS and IVOO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.87

The correlation between FLQS and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQS vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQS
IVOO

Technology

17.1%
15.7%

Industrials

16.3%
25.1%

Consumer Cyclical

15.6%
10.7%

Financial Services

12.6%
14.4%

Healthcare

9.6%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
3.8%

Real Estate

6.7%
7.5%

Utilities

5.8%
3.1%

Energy

4.6%
5.5%

Basic Materials

2.1%
4.8%

Communication Services

1.9%
1.0%

Technology

FLQS
17.1%
IVOO
15.7%

Industrials

FLQS
16.3%
IVOO
25.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQS
15.6%
IVOO
10.7%

Financial Services

FLQS
12.6%
IVOO
14.4%

Healthcare

FLQS
9.6%
IVOO
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLQS
7.8%
IVOO
3.8%

Real Estate

FLQS
6.7%
IVOO
7.5%

Utilities

FLQS
5.8%
IVOO
3.1%

Energy

FLQS
4.6%
IVOO
5.5%

Basic Materials

FLQS
2.1%
IVOO
4.8%

Communication Services

FLQS
1.9%
IVOO
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQS vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQS vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQSIVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.29

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.91

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

10.61

-6.06

FLQS vs. IVOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQS Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQS and IVOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQSIVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.65

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.42

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.62

-0.24

Drawdowns

FLQS vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, roughly equal to the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and IVOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQSIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-42.33%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-8.81%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.12%

-24.22%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-24.22%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.02%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-5.27%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.41%

+0.64%

Volatility

FLQS vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) is 4.09%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that FLQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQSIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

4.39%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

11.36%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

15.56%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.24%

19.72%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.68%

21.19%

+0.49%

FLQS vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLQS vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than IVOO's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.35%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%0.00%0.00%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQS and IVOO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOO has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to FLQS (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQS dropped -42.16% vs IVOO's -42.33%.

On 5-year performance, IVOO leads with 8.15% vs 5.27% for FLQS. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, FLQS has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 8.15% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLQS.

FLQS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.19% for IVOO.

FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLQS and 0.10% for IVOO.

IVOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQS and IVOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer