PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQS vs. FLCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLQS vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLQS vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
0.17%5.04%8.34%21.28%-16.88%26.58%10.51%18.34%-5.86%4.75%
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-5.65%32.55%18.00%-11.21%-22.74%-20.87%30.09%24.32%-19.52%0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQS achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -5.65% return.


FLQS

1D
0.88%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
0.17%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*

FLCH

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-5.65%
6M
-12.56%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
-4.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLQS vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLQS vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCH
FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQS vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQSFLCHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

0.32

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

0.59

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.08

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.45

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.01

1.29

+1.73

FLQS vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQS and FLCH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQSFLCHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

0.32

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.16

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.02

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between FLQS and FLCH is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLQS vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than FLCH's 2.50% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.44%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
2.50%2.36%2.87%3.47%2.69%1.48%0.91%1.98%1.92%0.01%

Drawdowns

FLQS vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and FLCH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQSFLCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-62.09%

+19.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-16.65%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-56.06%

+28.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.73%

-33.49%

+27.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-30.50%

+22.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

6.02%

-2.41%

Volatility

FLQS vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) is 5.34%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that FLQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLQSFLCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

6.44%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

13.92%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.34%

23.03%

-3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

29.58%

-10.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

28.06%

-6.26%