PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQS vs. DWAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQS vs. DWAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQS achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly lower than DWAS's 27.36% return.


FLQS

1D
0.72%
1M
4.88%
YTD
12.58%
6M
10.47%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*

DWAS

1D
2.34%
1M
5.71%
YTD
27.36%
6M
23.73%
1Y
48.14%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
14.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQS vs. DWAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
12.58%5.04%8.34%21.28%-16.88%26.58%10.51%18.34%-5.86%7.41%
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
27.36%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-10.68%16.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQS and DWAS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.77

The correlation between FLQS and DWAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLQS vs. DWAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQS
DWAS

Technology

18.2%
20.9%

Industrials

16.0%
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.0%
5.9%

Financial Services

12.7%
13.3%

Healthcare

9.9%
25.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
3.0%

Real Estate

6.7%
1.2%

Utilities

5.7%
0.3%

Energy

4.2%
6.5%

Basic Materials

2.1%
3.9%

Communication Services

1.8%
1.1%

Technology

FLQS
18.2%
DWAS
20.9%

Industrials

FLQS
16.0%
DWAS
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQS
15.0%
DWAS
5.9%

Financial Services

FLQS
12.7%
DWAS
13.3%

Healthcare

FLQS
9.9%
DWAS
25.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLQS
7.8%
DWAS
3.0%

Real Estate

FLQS
6.7%
DWAS
1.2%

Utilities

FLQS
5.7%
DWAS
0.3%

Energy

FLQS
4.2%
DWAS
6.5%

Basic Materials

FLQS
2.1%
DWAS
3.9%

Communication Services

FLQS
1.8%
DWAS
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQS vs. DWAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQS vs. DWAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLQSDWASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

4.83

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

15.55

-8.59

FLQS vs. DWAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQS Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the DWAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQS and DWAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLQS vs. DWAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum DWAS drawdown of -46.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and DWAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQSDWASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-46.16%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-10.02%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.12%

-33.83%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-33.83%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-10.26%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.10%

-0.06%

Volatility

FLQS vs. DWAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) is 3.65%, while Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that FLQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQSDWASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

8.83%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

18.16%

-7.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

24.03%

-8.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

25.87%

-6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.64%

26.69%

-5.05%

FLQS vs. DWAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAS's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLQS vs. DWAS - Dividend Comparison

FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.00%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.28%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQS and DWAS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWAS has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to FLQS (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQS dropped -42.16% vs DWAS's -46.16%.

On 5-year performance, DWAS leads with 7.33% vs 6.22% for FLQS. On fees, FLQS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FLQS has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DWAS has performed better with a 7.33% return vs 6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLQS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

FLQS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.

FLQS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DWAS is Momentum. FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLQS and 0.60% for DWAS.

DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQS and DWAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer