PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQL vs. ALTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLQL vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLQL vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
-2.22%19.64%24.33%23.58%-14.83%26.58%20.93%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
2.39%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%33.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 2.39% return.


FLQL

1D
3.25%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*

ALTL

1D
0.37%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
2.39%
6M
4.18%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLQL vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLQL vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL
FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQL vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQLALTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

1.49

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

2.03

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.98

-1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.82

10.34

-1.53

FLQL vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and ALTL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQLALTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.49

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.18

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.62

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and ALTL is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLQL vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than ALTL's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
1.16%1.10%1.13%1.50%2.07%1.81%1.99%1.78%1.82%1.22%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
1.07%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than ALTL's maximum drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and ALTL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQLALTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-31.91%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-9.79%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-31.91%

+10.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-5.43%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-11.85%

+7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.82%

-0.32%

Volatility

FLQL vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) at 2.97%. This indicates that FLQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLQLALTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

2.97%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

13.20%

-2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.56%

18.61%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

18.23%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

20.11%

-2.54%