PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLPSX vs. VMFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLPSX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLPSX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than VMFVX's 9.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLPSX having a 10.91% annualized return and VMFVX not far behind at 10.55%.


FLPSX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.11%
YTD
10.04%
6M
11.00%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
10.91%

VMFVX

1D
1.05%
1M
2.15%
YTD
9.39%
6M
9.65%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLPSX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
10.04%14.69%7.23%14.41%-5.69%24.46%9.34%25.75%-10.80%18.88%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.39%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FLPSX and VMFVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.91

The correlation between FLPSX and VMFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLPSX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLPSX
FLPSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FLPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FLPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLPSX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLPSXVMFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.18

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

7.51

+1.37

FLPSX vs. VMFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLPSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the VMFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLPSX and VMFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLPSXVMFVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.51

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.40

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.48

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.52

+0.33

Drawdowns

FLPSX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLPSX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than VMFVX's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLPSX and VMFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLPSXVMFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-45.79%

-9.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-10.52%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-22.46%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.76%

-22.46%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.16%

-45.79%

+7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-5.48%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.05%

-0.45%

Volatility

FLPSX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) is 3.31%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that FLPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLPSXVMFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

4.02%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

10.50%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

15.14%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

19.47%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

21.88%

-4.52%

FLPSX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLPSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLPSX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison

FLPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, more than VMFVX's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
12.07%13.28%16.24%18.29%9.45%12.11%11.14%8.14%13.45%7.45%4.85%4.04%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.72%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FLPSX and VMFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMFVX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FLPSX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLPSX dropped -54.81% vs VMFVX's -45.79%.

FLPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLPSX and VMFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer