PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLPSX vs. DFQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLPSX vs. DFQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLPSX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than DFQTX's 12.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FLPSX has underperformed DFQTX with an annualized return of 10.91%, while DFQTX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.


FLPSX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.11%
YTD
10.04%
6M
11.00%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
10.91%

DFQTX

1D
0.51%
1M
5.05%
YTD
12.21%
6M
12.50%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLPSX vs. DFQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
10.04%14.69%7.23%14.41%-5.69%24.46%9.34%25.75%-10.80%18.88%
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
12.21%15.99%20.27%21.88%-14.21%28.46%15.72%29.41%-9.65%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FLPSX and DFQTX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2005

0.93

The correlation between FLPSX and DFQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLPSX vs. DFQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLPSX
FLPSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FLPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FLPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DFQTX
DFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLPSX vs. DFQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLPSXDFQTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

3.60

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

15.77

-6.89

FLPSX vs. DFQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLPSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the DFQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLPSX and DFQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLPSXDFQTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.62

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.74

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.78

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.51

+0.34

Drawdowns

FLPSX vs. DFQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLPSX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, smaller than the maximum DFQTX drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLPSX and DFQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLPSXDFQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-59.35%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-8.47%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-19.71%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.76%

-22.64%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.16%

-37.21%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-7.78%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

1.92%

+0.68%

Volatility

FLPSX vs. DFQTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FLPSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLPSXDFQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

2.94%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

8.90%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

11.67%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

16.99%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

18.26%

-0.90%

FLPSX vs. DFQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLPSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than DFQTX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLPSX vs. DFQTX - Dividend Comparison

FLPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, more than DFQTX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
0.95%1.06%1.15%1.74%4.43%4.74%1.29%3.50%2.84%1.97%1.80%3.78%
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
12.07%13.28%16.24%18.29%9.45%12.11%11.14%8.14%13.45%7.45%4.85%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLPSX and DFQTX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLPSX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to DFQTX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLPSX dropped -54.81% vs DFQTX's -59.35%.

DFQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLPSX and DFQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer