DFQTX vs. DURPX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) and DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX).
DFQTX is managed by Dimensional. DURPX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on May 16, 2017.
Performance
DFQTX vs. DURPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFQTX vs. DURPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFQTX DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I | -4.02% | 15.99% | 20.27% | 21.88% | -14.21% | 28.46% | 15.72% | 29.41% | -9.65% | 12.47% |
DURPX DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio | -5.20% | 12.81% | 20.49% | 21.85% | -11.82% | 25.27% | 19.29% | 33.11% | -5.11% | 17.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFQTX achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly higher than DURPX's -5.20% return.
DFQTX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -7.31%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- 16.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
DURPX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -4.57%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFQTX vs. DURPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFQTX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DURPX's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DFQTX vs. DURPX — Risk / Return Rank
DFQTX
DURPX
DFQTX vs. DURPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) and DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFQTX | DURPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.60 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 0.98 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 0.69 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.74 | 3.27 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFQTX | DURPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.60 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.67 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.77 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFQTX and DURPX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFQTX vs. DURPX - Dividend Comparison
DFQTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, which matches DURPX's 1.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFQTX DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I | 1.12% | 1.06% | 1.15% | 1.74% | 4.43% | 4.74% | 1.29% | 3.50% | 2.84% | 1.97% | 1.80% | 3.78% |
DURPX DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.49% | 3.65% | 4.12% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.69% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFQTX vs. DURPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFQTX drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, which is greater than DURPX's maximum drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFQTX and DURPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFQTX | DURPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.35% | -31.02% | -28.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -12.29% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -21.90% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.47% | -8.67% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -4.12% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.61% | +0.18% |
Volatility
DFQTX vs. DURPX - Volatility Comparison
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) at 3.95%. This indicates that DFQTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DURPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFQTX | DURPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 3.95% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 8.43% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.07% | 17.20% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 15.86% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 17.68% | +0.57% |