PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFQTX vs. DURPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFQTX vs. DURPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) and DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFQTX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than DURPX's 8.98% return.


DFQTX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.40%
YTD
11.69%
6M
10.66%
1Y
28.21%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
14.14%

DURPX

1D
1.02%
1M
1.85%
YTD
8.98%
6M
8.14%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFQTX vs. DURPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
11.69%15.99%20.27%21.88%-14.21%28.46%15.72%29.41%-9.65%12.35%
DURPX
DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio
8.98%12.81%20.49%21.85%-11.82%25.27%19.29%33.11%-5.11%17.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DFQTX and DURPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2017

0.94

The correlation between DFQTX and DURPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFQTX vs. DURPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFQTX
DFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DURPX
DURPX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DURPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DURPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DURPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DURPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DURPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFQTX vs. DURPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) and DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFQTXDURPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.42

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

10.18

+4.32

DFQTX vs. DURPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFQTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the DURPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFQTX and DURPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFQTX vs. DURPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFQTX drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, which is greater than DURPX's maximum drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFQTX and DURPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFQTXDURPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.35%

-31.02%

-28.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-8.67%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-18.38%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-21.90%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.80%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-4.05%

-3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.06%

-0.11%

Volatility

DFQTX vs. DURPX - Volatility Comparison

DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) and DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFQTXDURPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.54%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

9.47%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

11.76%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

15.96%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

17.59%

+0.70%

DFQTX vs. DURPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFQTX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DURPX's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFQTX vs. DURPX - Dividend Comparison

DFQTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than DURPX's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
0.96%1.06%1.15%1.74%4.43%4.74%1.29%3.50%2.84%1.97%1.80%3.78%
DURPX
DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio
0.97%1.05%1.20%1.49%3.65%4.12%1.34%1.36%1.69%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DFQTX and DURPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DURPX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to DFQTX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFQTX dropped -59.35% vs DURPX's -31.02%.

DFQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFQTX and DURPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer