PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLPSX vs. DFFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLPSX vs. DFFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class (DFFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLPSX achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly lower than DFFVX's 20.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLPSX having a 11.35% annualized return and DFFVX not far behind at 11.29%.


FLPSX

1D
0.65%
1M
2.96%
6M
10.75%
YTD
15.72%
1Y
25.13%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
11.35%
ALL TIME*
12.96%

DFFVX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.73%
6M
12.71%
YTD
20.09%
1Y
35.50%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
11.29%
ALL TIME*
11.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLPSX vs. DFFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
15.72%14.69%7.23%14.41%-5.69%24.46%9.34%25.75%-10.80%18.88%
DFFVX
DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class
20.09%9.53%9.34%19.37%-4.66%31.53%3.78%21.51%-15.79%9.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FLPSX and DFFVX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2000

0.93

The correlation between FLPSX and DFFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLPSX vs. DFFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLPSX
FLPSX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FLPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FLPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DFFVX
DFFVX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DFFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DFFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLPSX vs. DFFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class (DFFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLPSXDFFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

3.28

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

11.12

-2.32

FLPSX vs. DFFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLPSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the DFFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLPSX and DFFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLPSX vs. DFFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLPSX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, smaller than the maximum DFFVX drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLPSX and DFFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLPSXDFFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-64.21%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-9.70%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-26.09%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.76%

-26.09%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.16%

-50.75%

+12.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-9.65%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.86%

-0.31%

Volatility

FLPSX vs. DFFVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) is 2.82%, while DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class (DFFVX) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that FLPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLPSXDFFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.35%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

10.52%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

16.43%

-3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

21.27%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

23.55%

-6.29%

FLPSX vs. DFFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLPSX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than DFFVX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLPSX vs. DFFVX - Dividend Comparison

FLPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%, more than DFFVX's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFFVX
DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class
1.49%1.69%1.40%2.26%5.17%2.74%1.52%3.82%5.95%5.16%3.95%5.84%
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
11.48%13.28%16.24%18.29%9.45%12.11%11.14%8.14%13.45%7.45%4.85%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLPSX and DFFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFFVX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to FLPSX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLPSX dropped -54.81% vs DFFVX's -64.21%.

DFFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLPSX and DFFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer