DFFVX vs. VBR
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR).
DFFVX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 23, 2000. VBR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Performance
DFFVX vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFFVX vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio | 5.44% | 9.53% | 9.34% | 19.37% | -4.66% | 31.53% | 3.78% | 21.51% | -15.79% | 9.20% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 3.59% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFFVX achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 3.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFFVX having a 10.46% annualized return and VBR not far behind at 10.14%.
DFFVX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 14.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
VBR
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 19.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFFVX vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFFVX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFFVX vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
DFFVX
VBR
DFFVX vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFFVX | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.93 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.43 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.37 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | 5.62 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFFVX | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.93 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.47 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.40 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFFVX and VBR is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFFVX vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
DFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than VBR's 1.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio | 1.63% | 1.69% | 1.40% | 2.26% | 5.17% | 2.74% | 1.52% | 3.82% | 5.95% | 5.16% | 3.95% | 5.84% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.90% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Drawdowns
DFFVX vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFFVX drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFFVX and VBR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFFVX | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -61.98% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.71% | -14.18% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -24.19% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.75% | -45.28% | -5.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -5.75% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -8.32% | -1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 3.46% | +0.52% |
Volatility
DFFVX vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) have volatilities of 5.40% and 5.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFFVX | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 5.40% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.36% | 11.29% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.64% | 20.64% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 19.85% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 21.73% | +1.95% |