PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOT vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLOT vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FLOT has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 3.04%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.


FLOT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.23%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
3.04%

VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
1.30%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOT vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.99%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%1.65%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOT and VEA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011

0.13

The correlation between FLOT and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOT vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOT vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLOTVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.23

1.33

+1.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.32

2.58

+8.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

105.27

9.92

+95.35

FLOT vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOT Sharpe Ratio is 6.56, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOT and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLOT vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOTVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.54%

-60.68%

+47.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-11.63%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

-13.45%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.36%

-29.71%

+27.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

-35.73%

+22.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.06%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-13.28%

+13.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

3.02%

-2.97%

Volatility

FLOT vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) is 0.21%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that FLOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLOTVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

6.84%

-6.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.63%

14.38%

-13.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75%

16.58%

-15.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.77%

16.72%

-14.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

17.40%

-13.25%

FLOT vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLOT vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.53%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLOT and VEA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to FLOT (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOT dropped -13.54% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.72% vs 3.04% for FLOT. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 3.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLOT.

FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

FLOT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLOT and 0.03% for VEA.

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.56 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLOT and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer