PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOT vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLOT vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than SPYV's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FLOT has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 3.04%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.


FLOT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.23%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
3.04%

SPYV

1D
0.69%
1M
1.81%
YTD
8.25%
6M
8.02%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOT vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.99%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%1.65%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
8.25%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOT and SPYV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011

0.13

The correlation between FLOT and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOT vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOT vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLOTSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.23

1.37

+1.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.32

3.33

+7.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

105.27

12.73

+92.54

FLOT vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOT Sharpe Ratio is 6.56, which is higher than the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOT and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLOT vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOTSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.54%

-58.45%

+44.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-6.22%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

-17.54%

+15.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.36%

-17.89%

+15.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

-36.89%

+23.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.18%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-8.71%

+8.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

1.63%

-1.58%

Volatility

FLOT vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) is 0.21%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that FLOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLOTSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

2.70%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.63%

7.26%

-6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75%

9.97%

-9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.77%

14.42%

-12.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

16.94%

-12.79%

FLOT vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLOT vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than SPYV's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.53%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.68%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLOT and SPYV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYV has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to FLOT (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOT dropped -13.54% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 12.08% vs 3.04% for FLOT. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 3.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLOT.

FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 1.68% for SPYV.

FLOT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SPYV is S&P 500. FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLOT and 0.04% for SPYV.

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.56 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLOT and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer