FLOT vs. GSST
FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) and GSST (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. FLOT is passively managed, while GSST is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLOT returned 4.22%/yr vs 3.77%/yr for GSST. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLOT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for GSST.
Performance
FLOT vs. GSST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than GSST's 1.66% return.
FLOT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.04%
GSST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- —
FLOT vs. GSST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.99% | 4.91% | 6.53% | 6.43% | 1.28% | 0.45% | 0.87% | 2.18% |
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.66% | 5.20% | 6.01% | 6.08% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 1.74% | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOT and GSST is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOT vs. GSST — Risk / Return Rank
FLOT
GSST
FLOT vs. GSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLOT | GSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.23 | 3.93 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.32 | 29.85 | -18.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 105.27 | 184.69 | -79.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLOT vs. GSST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, which is greater than GSST's maximum drawdown of -3.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and GSST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOT | GSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.54% | -3.51% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.43% | -0.15% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.57% | -0.25% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.36% | -1.19% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -0.16% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.02% | +0.03% |
Volatility
FLOT vs. GSST - Volatility Comparison
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) has a higher volatility of 0.21% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) at 0.13%. This indicates that FLOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLOT | GSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 0.13% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.63% | 0.41% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75% | 0.58% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 0.63% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 0.86% | +3.29% |
FLOT vs. GSST - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GSST's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLOT vs. GSST - Dividend Comparison
FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than GSST's 4.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.84% | 5.82% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.46% | 0.97% | 0.53% |
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.31% | 4.56% | 5.45% | 4.98% | 1.97% | 0.71% | 1.12% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLOT and GSST have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLOT has higher volatility (0.21%) compared to GSST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOT dropped -13.54% vs GSST's -3.51%.
On 5-year performance, FLOT leads with 4.22% vs 3.77% for GSST. On fees, FLOT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 4.22% return vs 3.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLOT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for GSST.
FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 4.31% for GSST.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLOT and 0.16% for GSST.
GSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.94 vs 6.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLOT and GSST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer