FLO vs. KO
FLO (Flowers Foods, Inc.) and KO (The Coca-Cola Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — FLO in Packaged Foods, KO in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic. Over the past 10 years, FLO returned -4.87%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for KO. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FLO vs. KO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLO achieves a -32.62% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 26.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FLO has underperformed KO with an annualized return of -4.87%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.64% annualized return.
FLO
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -18.66%
- 6M
- -35.86%
- YTD
- -32.62%
- 1Y
- -51.82%
- 3Y*
- -30.35%
- 5Y*
- -17.66%
- 10Y*
- -4.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.13%
KO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- YTD
- 26.97%
- 1Y
- 30.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.48M | $40.44M | $62.79M | |
| $1.49B | $1.47B | $1.44B |
FLO vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. | -32.62% | -43.63% | -4.34% | -18.63% | 7.97% | 25.63% | 7.73% | 21.80% | -0.93% | 0.22% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 26.97% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLO and KO is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.26 |
The correlation between FLO and KO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FLO:
$1.49B
KO:
$376.85B
FLO:
$0.66
KO:
$3.32
FLO:
10.62
KO:
26.39
FLO:
0.60
KO:
7.54
FLO:
1.15
KO:
10.45
FLO:
$2.47B
KO:
$50.13B
FLO:
$1.19B
KO:
$31.02B
FLO:
$289.47M
KO:
$19.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLO vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank
FLO
KO
FLO vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLO | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.32 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 4.17 | -5.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 9.09 | -10.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLO vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLO drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLO and KO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLO | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -68.23% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.26% | -7.87% | -47.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.82% | -15.50% | -53.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.29% | -17.27% | -55.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.29% | -36.99% | -35.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.80% | -1.67% | -70.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.79% | -16.06% | -4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.14% | 3.60% | +33.54% |
Volatility
FLO vs. KO - Volatility Comparison
Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) has a higher volatility of 11.37% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 9.09%. This indicates that FLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLO | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.37% | 9.09% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.84% | 15.06% | +15.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.61% | 18.66% | +18.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.85% | 16.64% | +9.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 18.42% | +7.16% |
Dividends
FLO vs. KO - Dividend Comparison
FLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.36%, more than KO's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. | 12.36% | 9.03% | 4.60% | 4.04% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 3.45% | 3.84% | 3.47% | 3.13% | 2.64% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.37% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
Financials
FLO vs. KO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowers Foods, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLO vs. KO - Profitability Comparison
FLO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of -559.92M and revenue of -1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 8.42B and revenue of 13.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.
FLO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -69.09M and revenue of -1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.67B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
FLO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a net income of 109.13M and revenue of -1.23B, resulting in a net margin of -8.9%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 4.43B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in a net margin of 33.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLO and KO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLO has higher volatility (11.37%) compared to KO (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLO dropped -72.29% vs KO's -68.23%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLO and KO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer