PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLMX vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLMX vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMX achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 65.26% return.


FLMX

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.31%
6M
2.45%
YTD
12.37%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
10.51%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.99%

FLKR

1D
2.41%
1M
-10.75%
6M
33.85%
YTD
65.26%
1Y
129.79%
3Y*
38.63%
5Y*
14.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$59.58M$54.36M$54.35M
$237.66K$216.97K$406.60K

FLMX vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLMX
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
12.37%53.62%-28.45%39.35%2.40%19.58%-3.50%12.13%-13.32%-0.96%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
65.26%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FLMX and FLKR is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.47

The correlation between FLMX and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLMX vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLMX
FLKR

Consumer Defensive

29.5%
2.2%

Financial Services

20.3%
12.3%

Basic Materials

18.8%
2.9%

Industrials

14.2%
17.1%

Communication Services

8.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

7.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
7.1%

Energy

-

0.7%

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Technology

-

50.8%

Utilities

-

0.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLMX
29.5%
FLKR
2.2%

Financial Services

FLMX
20.3%
FLKR
12.3%

Basic Materials

FLMX
18.8%
FLKR
2.9%

Industrials

FLMX
14.2%
FLKR
17.1%

Communication Services

FLMX
8.4%
FLKR
2.5%

Real Estate

FLMX
7.4%
FLKR

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLMX
1.4%
FLKR
7.1%

Energy

FLMX

-

FLKR
0.7%

Healthcare

FLMX

-

FLKR
3.6%

Technology

FLMX

-

FLKR
50.8%

Utilities

FLMX

-

FLKR
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLMX vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLMX
FLMX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLMX vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLMXFLKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.82

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

13.36

-5.90

FLMX vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMX and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLMX vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, roughly equal to the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMX and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMXFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.05%

-50.06%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.18%

-34.17%

+19.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.72%

-34.17%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.72%

-47.97%

+16.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-26.69%

+22.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.92%

-21.96%

+10.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

9.75%

-5.31%

Volatility

FLMX vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) is 5.20%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 21.44%. This indicates that FLMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLMXFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

21.44%

-16.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.93%

50.34%

-32.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.81%

53.44%

-31.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.07%

32.18%

-10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

29.79%

-5.19%

FLMX vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLMX vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

FLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than FLKR's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.79%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%
FLMX
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
3.81%3.99%3.31%2.90%4.22%3.15%1.48%2.95%2.51%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLMX and FLKR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (21.44%) compared to FLMX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMX dropped -50.05% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 14.00% vs 12.84% for FLMX. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLMX has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLMX.

FLMX has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.79% for FLKR.

FLMX is categorized as Latin America Equities, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. FLMX tracks FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLMX and 0.09% for FLKR.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLMX and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer