FLMB vs. WTIU
FLMB (Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - FLMB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). FLMB is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLMB returned 3.83%/yr vs -1.04%/yr for WTIU. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLMB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
FLMB vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLMB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 95.37% return.
FLMB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.13%
WTIU
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 39.23%
- 6M
- 55.77%
- YTD
- 95.37%
- 1Y
- 104.76%
- 3Y*
- -1.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $236.78K | $198.32K | $268.48K | |
| $1.41M | $930.94K | $851.49K |
FLMB vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMB Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF | 0.50% | 3.93% | 2.47% | 4.39% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 95.37% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -28.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLMB and WTIU is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023 | -0.13 |
The correlation between FLMB and WTIU shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to -0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLMB vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
FLMB
WTIU
FLMB vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLMB | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.25 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.19 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 4.99 | +1.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLMB vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLMB drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMB and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLMB | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -75.73% | +57.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -48.11% | +44.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.44% | -75.73% | +69.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -30.75% | +28.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -39.20% | +35.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 21.07% | -20.12% |
Volatility
FLMB vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) is 1.16%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 22.17%. This indicates that FLMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLMB | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 22.17% | -21.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 57.97% | -55.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.49% | 69.79% | -66.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 70.86% | -65.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.54% | 70.86% | -65.32% |
FLMB vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLMB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLMB vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
FLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMB Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF | 4.13% | 3.86% | 3.79% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 1.66% | 2.07% | 2.40% | 2.68% | 0.54% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLMB and WTIU have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTIU has higher volatility (22.17%) compared to FLMB (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMB dropped -17.90% vs WTIU's -75.73%.
On 3-year performance, FLMB leads with 3.83% vs -1.04% for WTIU. On fees, FLMB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FLMB has performed better with a 3.83% return vs -1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLMB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.
FLMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
FLMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLMB and 0.95% for WTIU.
FLMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLMB and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer