PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLMB vs. ACTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLMB vs. ACTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) and Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMB achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than ACTHX's 1.36% return.


FLMB

1D
-0.19%
1M
-2.17%
6M
-0.12%
YTD
0.38%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
3.54%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.12%

ACTHX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-2.39%
6M
0.90%
YTD
1.36%
1Y
6.75%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
2.45%
ALL TIME*
4.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$229.43K$195.54K$266.37K

FLMB vs. ACTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLMB
Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF
0.38%3.93%2.47%7.72%-12.16%0.80%7.39%8.90%0.43%0.63%
ACTHX
Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund
1.36%4.38%5.54%4.34%-13.94%6.29%3.25%10.12%1.44%1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FLMB and ACTHX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2017

0.65

The correlation between FLMB and ACTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLMB vs. ACTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLMB
FLMB Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FLMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ACTHX
ACTHX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ACTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ACTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLMB vs. ACTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) and Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLMBACTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.51

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.73

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.56

10.02

-2.46

FLMB vs. ACTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the ACTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMB and ACTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLMB vs. ACTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMB drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum ACTHX drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMB and ACTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMBACTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.90%

-27.29%

+9.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-2.98%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.44%

-8.79%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.88%

-19.83%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-2.50%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-3.54%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.81%

+0.13%

Volatility

FLMB vs. ACTHX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX) at 1.03%. This indicates that FLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLMBACTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

1.03%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

2.90%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56%

3.78%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.13%

5.75%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.54%

5.40%

+0.14%

FLMB vs. ACTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ACTHX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLMB vs. ACTHX - Dividend Comparison

FLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than ACTHX's 4.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACTHX
Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund
4.98%7.14%5.64%4.22%4.72%3.95%4.33%4.70%4.78%4.71%5.11%4.93%
FLMB
Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF
3.72%3.86%3.79%3.49%2.80%1.66%2.07%2.40%2.68%0.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLMB and ACTHX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLMB has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to ACTHX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMB dropped -17.90% vs ACTHX's -27.29%.

ACTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLMB and ACTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer