FLLV vs. KONG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLLV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF) and KONG (Formidable Fortress ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLLV returned 17.11%/yr vs 9.34%/yr for KONG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLLV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for KONG.

Performance

FLLV vs. KONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLLV achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than KONG's 2.62% return.

FLLV

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 14.26%
• 1Y: 26.92%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 11.11%
• 10Y*: —

KONG

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.91%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 6M: 3.53%
• 1Y: 7.33%
• 3Y*: 9.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLLV vs. KONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF	13.04%	15.92%	10.70%	13.87%	-8.54%	8.45%
KONG Formidable Fortress ETF	2.62%	6.56%	9.67%	12.71%	-9.63%	5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FLLV and KONG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FLLV and KONG has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLLV vs. KONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLLV	KONG
Technology	28.8%	33.1%
Financial Services	13.0%	9.3%
Healthcare	11.6%	13.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	2.9%
Industrials	9.6%	15.7%
Communication Services	7.8%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	3.4%
Energy	4.4%	5.0%
Basic Materials	2.7%	3.6%
Utilities	2.6%	-
Real Estate	2.5%	6.1%

Return for Risk

FLLV vs. KONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLLV

FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 91
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

KONG

KONG Risk / Return Rank: 21
KONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
KONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
KONG Omega Ratio Rank: 19
KONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
KONG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLLV vs. KONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLLV	KONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.26	0.68	+2.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.73	1.02	+3.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.12	+0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.52	0.86	+4.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.83	3.46	+17.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLLV vs. KONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLLV Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the KONG Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLLV and KONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLLV	KONG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.26	0.68	+2.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.36	+0.48

Drawdowns

FLLV vs. KONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLLV drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, which is greater than KONG's maximum drawdown of -19.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLV and KONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLLV	KONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.95%	-19.98%	-13.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.90%	-8.54%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.01%	-15.48%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.91%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.25%	-5.81%	+2.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.30%	2.12%	-0.82%

Volatility

FLLV vs. KONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) is 2.02%, while Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) has a volatility of 2.26%. This indicates that FLLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLLV	KONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.02%	2.26%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.96%	8.52%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.32%	10.84%	-2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.27%	14.59%	-1.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	14.59%	+1.10%

FLLV vs. KONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLLV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than KONG's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLLV vs. KONG - Dividend Comparison

FLLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than KONG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF	4.73%	4.71%	3.25%	1.75%	1.68%	1.41%	1.40%	1.31%	1.55%	1.44%	0.50%
KONG Formidable Fortress ETF	0.36%	0.37%	0.78%	0.69%	0.49%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLLV and KONG in my portfolio?

FLLV and KONG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLLV or KONG?

KONG has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to FLLV (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLLV dropped -33.95% vs KONG's -19.98%.

Which ETF is better, FLLV or KONG?

On 3-year performance, FLLV leads with 17.11% vs 9.34% for KONG. On fees, FLLV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLLV or KONG?

Over the 3-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 17.11% return vs 9.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLLV or KONG?

FLLV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KONG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLLV or KONG?

FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 0.36% for KONG.

What is the main difference between FLLV and KONG?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Formidable Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLLV and 0.89% for KONG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.