PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KONG vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KONG vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KONG achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 9.79% return.


KONG

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.91%
YTD
2.62%
6M
3.53%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
9.34%
5Y*
10Y*

GDE

1D
-1.35%
1M
1.88%
YTD
9.79%
6M
11.87%
1Y
53.13%
3Y*
46.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KONG vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
KONG
Formidable Fortress ETF
2.62%6.56%9.67%12.71%-2.14%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
9.79%73.76%44.79%33.85%-18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between KONG and GDE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.52

The correlation between KONG and GDE shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KONG vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KONG
KONG Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
KONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KONG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KONG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KONG vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KONGGDEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

1.88

-1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

2.32

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.34

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

2.36

-1.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.46

7.34

-3.88

KONG vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KONG Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KONG and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KONGGDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.88

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.15

-0.79

Drawdowns

KONG vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KONG drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum GDE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KONG and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KONGGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.98%

-32.01%

+12.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-22.66%

+14.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-22.66%

+7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-11.17%

+10.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-7.88%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

7.26%

-5.14%

Volatility

KONG vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) is 2.26%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that KONG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KONGGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

6.65%

-4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

24.24%

-15.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

28.39%

-17.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

26.12%

-11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.59%

26.12%

-11.53%

KONG vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KONG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

KONG vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

KONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than GDE's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
3.94%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%0.00%
KONG
Formidable Fortress ETF
0.36%0.37%0.78%0.69%0.49%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


KONG and GDE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDE has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to KONG (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KONG dropped -19.98% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 46.68% vs 9.34% for KONG. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KONG has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 46.68% return vs 9.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KONG.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 0.36% for KONG.

KONG is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Formidable Asset Management and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for KONG and 0.20% for GDE.

GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KONG and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer