KONG vs. QLVD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KONG (Formidable Fortress ETF) and QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. KONG is actively managed, while QLVD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KONG returned 7.82%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for QLVD. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KONG charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QLVD.

Performance

KONG vs. QLVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KONG achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than QLVD's 2.90% return.

KONG

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: -0.44%
• 6M: -1.57%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: 7.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLVD

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 6M: 2.39%
• 1Y: 8.20%
• 3Y*: 11.75%
• 5Y*: 5.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KONG vs. QLVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KONG Formidable Fortress ETF	-0.44%	6.56%	9.67%	12.71%	-9.63%	5.15%
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	2.90%	24.21%	4.67%	11.57%	-12.09%	2.18%

Correlation

The correlation between KONG and QLVD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021	0.59

The correlation between KONG and QLVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

KONG vs. QLVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KONG	QLVD
Technology	35.2%	5.3%
Industrials	16.8%	15.2%
Healthcare	12.4%	10.6%
Communication Services	8.3%	6.6%
Financial Services	7.7%	24.8%
Real Estate	5.8%	5.3%
Energy	5.4%	3.8%
Basic Materials	3.6%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.7%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	11.0%
Utilities	-	7.6%

Return for Risk

KONG vs. QLVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KONG

KONG Risk / Return Rank: 15
KONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
KONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
KONG Omega Ratio Rank: 14
KONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
KONG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

QLVD

QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 22
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 21
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KONG vs. QLVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KONG	QLVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	0.78	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	1.17	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.14	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	1.01	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.05	2.75	-0.70

KONG vs. QLVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KONG Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the QLVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KONG and QLVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KONG vs. QLVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KONG drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum QLVD drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KONG and QLVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	KONG	QLVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.98%	-28.20%	+8.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.54%	-8.15%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.48%	-9.24%	-6.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.87%	-5.98%	+2.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.78%	-5.24%	-0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.99%	-0.77%

Volatility

KONG vs. QLVD - Volatility Comparison

Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) at 2.92%. This indicates that KONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KONG	QLVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	2.92%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.70%	8.56%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	10.59%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.56%	11.75%	+2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.56%	13.95%	+0.61%

KONG vs. QLVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KONG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than QLVD's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

KONG vs. QLVD - Dividend Comparison

KONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than QLVD's 3.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KONG Formidable Fortress ETF	0.37%	0.37%	0.78%	0.69%	0.49%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	3.12%	2.87%	3.01%	3.33%	2.47%	3.06%	1.78%	1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KONG and QLVD in my portfolio?

KONG and QLVD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KONG or QLVD?

KONG has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to QLVD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KONG dropped -19.98% vs QLVD's -28.20%.

Which ETF is better, KONG or QLVD?

On 3-year performance, QLVD leads with 11.75% vs 7.82% for KONG. On fees, QLVD is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, QLVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KONG or QLVD?

Over the 3-year period, QLVD has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KONG or QLVD?

QLVD is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KONG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KONG or QLVD?

QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.37% for KONG.

What is the main difference between KONG and QLVD?

They also come from different issuers: Formidable Asset Management and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for KONG and 0.32% for QLVD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.