KONG vs. BUZZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KONG (Formidable Fortress ETF) and BUZZ (VanEck Social Sentiment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KONG is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund actively managed by Formidable Asset Management, while BUZZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index. KONG is actively managed, while BUZZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KONG returned 7.82%/yr vs 32.73%/yr for BUZZ. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KONG charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BUZZ.

Performance

KONG vs. BUZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) and VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KONG achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than BUZZ's 12.47% return.

KONG

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: -0.44%
• 6M: -1.57%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: 7.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUZZ

• 1D: -2.51%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 12.47%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 28.24%
• 3Y*: 32.73%
• 5Y*: 7.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KONG vs. BUZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KONG Formidable Fortress ETF	-0.44%	6.56%	9.67%	12.71%	-9.63%	5.15%
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	12.47%	30.61%	33.74%	54.64%	-47.67%	-9.05%

Correlation

The correlation between KONG and BUZZ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021	0.63

The correlation between KONG and BUZZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

KONG vs. BUZZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KONG	BUZZ
Technology	35.2%	48.9%
Industrials	16.8%	5.0%
Healthcare	12.4%	4.5%
Communication Services	8.3%	13.7%
Financial Services	7.7%	12.9%
Real Estate	5.8%	-
Energy	5.4%	0.6%
Basic Materials	3.6%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	2.7%	11.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	1.5%
Utilities	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

KONG vs. BUZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KONG

KONG Risk / Return Rank: 15
KONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
KONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
KONG Omega Ratio Rank: 14
KONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
KONG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

BUZZ

BUZZ Risk / Return Rank: 23
BUZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BUZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BUZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BUZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BUZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KONG vs. BUZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) and VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KONG	BUZZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	0.86	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	1.30	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.16	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	0.93	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.05	2.23	-0.18

KONG vs. BUZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KONG Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the BUZZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KONG and BUZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KONG vs. BUZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KONG drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum BUZZ drawdown of -56.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KONG and BUZZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	KONG	BUZZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.98%	-56.87%	+36.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.54%	-30.47%	+21.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.48%	-30.47%	+14.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-56.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.87%	-10.44%	+6.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.78%	-23.84%	+18.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	12.71%	-10.49%

Volatility

KONG vs. BUZZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) is 3.18%, while VanEck Social Sentiment ETF (BUZZ) has a volatility of 12.36%. This indicates that KONG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KONG	BUZZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	12.36%	-9.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.70%	25.02%	-16.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	32.91%	-21.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.56%	33.30%	-18.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.56%	32.91%	-18.35%

KONG vs. BUZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KONG has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BUZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

KONG vs. BUZZ - Dividend Comparison

KONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while BUZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUZZ VanEck Social Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.52%	0.40%	0.00%
KONG Formidable Fortress ETF	0.37%	0.37%	0.78%	0.69%	0.49%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KONG and BUZZ in my portfolio?

KONG and BUZZ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KONG or BUZZ?

BUZZ has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to KONG (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KONG dropped -19.98% vs BUZZ's -56.87%.

Which ETF is better, KONG or BUZZ?

On 3-year performance, BUZZ leads with 32.73% vs 7.82% for KONG. On fees, BUZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KONG has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KONG or BUZZ?

Over the 3-year period, BUZZ has performed better with a 32.73% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KONG or BUZZ?

BUZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KONG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KONG or BUZZ?

KONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for BUZZ.

What is the main difference between KONG and BUZZ?

KONG is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while BUZZ is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Formidable Asset Management and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for KONG and 0.75% for BUZZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.