PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLLV vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLLV vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLLV achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 114.41% return.


FLLV

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.34%
YTD
13.04%
6M
14.26%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*

FLKR

1D
-0.79%
1M
29.00%
YTD
114.41%
6M
130.14%
1Y
238.40%
3Y*
51.14%
5Y*
19.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLLV vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
13.04%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%3.89%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
114.41%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FLLV and FLKR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.49

The correlation between FLLV and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLLV vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLLV
FLKR

Technology

28.8%
64.3%

Financial Services

13.0%
7.6%

Healthcare

11.6%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
6.0%

Industrials

9.6%
12.8%

Communication Services

7.8%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
1.5%

Energy

4.4%
0.4%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.6%

Utilities

2.6%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Technology

FLLV
28.8%
FLKR
64.3%

Financial Services

FLLV
13.0%
FLKR
7.6%

Healthcare

FLLV
11.6%
FLKR
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FLLV
11.0%
FLKR
6.0%

Industrials

FLLV
9.6%
FLKR
12.8%

Communication Services

FLLV
7.8%
FLKR
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLLV
6.1%
FLKR
1.5%

Energy

FLLV
4.4%
FLKR
0.4%

Basic Materials

FLLV
2.7%
FLKR
2.6%

Utilities

FLLV
2.6%
FLKR
0.3%

Real Estate

FLLV
2.5%
FLKR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLLV vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLLV
FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLLV vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLLVFLKRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.26

5.83

-2.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.73

5.23

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.73

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

10.42

-4.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.83

38.67

-17.85

FLLV vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLLV Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 5.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLLV and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLLVFLKRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

5.83

-2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.69

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.55

+0.29

Drawdowns

FLLV vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLLV drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLV and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLLVFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-50.06%

+16.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.90%

-23.03%

+18.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.01%

-26.39%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

-49.51%

+31.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-1.77%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-22.07%

+18.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

6.20%

-4.90%

Volatility

FLLV vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) is 2.02%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.21%. This indicates that FLLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLLVFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

20.21%

-18.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.96%

36.52%

-30.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.32%

41.18%

-32.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

28.19%

-14.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

27.56%

-11.87%

FLLV vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLLV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLLV vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

FLLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than FLKR's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
1.80%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
4.73%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLLV and FLKR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to FLLV (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLLV dropped -33.95% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.48% vs 11.11% for FLLV. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLLV.

FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.80% for FLKR.

FLLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLLV and 0.09% for FLKR.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 3.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLLV and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer