PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FLKR vs. TUR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FLKR vs. TUR

Last updated Jul 21, 2026
Documentation

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and TUR (iShares MSCI Turkey ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while TUR is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 14.68%/yr vs 16.26%/yr for TUR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TUR.

Performance

FLKR vs. TUR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 67.20% return, which is significantly higher than TUR's 15.93% return.

FLKR

1D
0.49%
1M
-25.25%
6M
45.78%
YTD
67.20%
1Y
125.99%
3Y*
38.49%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
11.70%

TUR

1D
1.26%
1M
-3.76%
6M
3.89%
YTD
15.93%
1Y
22.19%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
3.98%
ALL TIME*
1.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. TUR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF		67.20%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%
TUR
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF		15.93%-1.54%12.91%-8.83%105.75%-27.41%-1.19%14.49%-41.46%5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and TUR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.30

The correlation between FLKR and TUR shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLKR vs. TUR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FLKR
TUR

Technology

53.7%
1.2%

Industrials

15.6%
25.2%

Financial Services

12.3%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
4.8%

Healthcare

3.3%
2.2%

Basic Materials

2.8%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
13.4%

Communication Services

1.8%
3.4%

Energy

0.6%
6.9%

Utilities

0.4%
1.7%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

FLKR
53.7%
TUR
1.2%

Industrials

FLKR
15.6%
TUR
25.2%

Financial Services

FLKR
12.3%
TUR
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLKR
7.2%
TUR
4.8%

Healthcare

FLKR
3.3%
TUR
2.2%

Basic Materials

FLKR
2.8%
TUR
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLKR
2.1%
TUR
13.4%

Communication Services

FLKR
1.8%
TUR
3.4%

Energy

FLKR
0.6%
TUR
6.9%

Utilities

FLKR
0.4%
TUR
1.7%

Real Estate

FLKR

-

TUR
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF

iShares MSCI Turkey ETF

Often compared with FLKR:
FLKR vs. EWYFLKR vs. SCHDFLKR vs. FLJPFLKR vs. VOOFLKR vs. KORUFLKR vs. HFXIFLKR vs. FLXK.DE
Often compared with TUR:
TUR vs. VOOTUR vs. HEDJTUR vs. AMRTUR vs. EPOLTUR vs. SPYTUR vs. VGKTUR vs. SFM

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. TUR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
TUR
TUR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. TUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FLKRTURDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.49
0.91

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.74
1.39

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.18

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

1.39

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.43

3.55

+11.88

FLKR vs. TUR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the TUR Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and TUR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. TUR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum TUR drawdown of -72.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and TUR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FLKRTURDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-72.34%

+22.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.19%

-16.07%

-10.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-31.63%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.97%

-31.63%

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-59.25%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.83%

-27.04%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.94%

-39.81%

+17.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.20%

6.27%

+1.93%

Volatility

FLKR vs. TUR - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 22.88% compared to iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) at 5.19%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FLKRTURDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.88%

5.19%

+17.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.04%

20.41%

+27.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.00%

24.64%

+26.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.34%

34.16%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.32%

34.13%

-4.81%

FLKR vs. TUR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TUR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKR vs. TUR - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than TUR's 2.13% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF		2.76%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%
TUR
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF		2.13%2.40%1.79%4.43%1.97%4.22%0.87%3.29%4.05%2.64%2.89%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

FLKR and TUR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (22.88%) compared to TUR (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs TUR's -72.34%.

On 5-year performance, TUR leads with 16.26% vs 14.68% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, TUR has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TUR has performed better with a 16.26% return vs 14.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TUR.

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.13% for TUR.

FLKR is categorized as South Korea Equities, while TUR is Emerging Markets Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while TUR tracks MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.59% for TUR.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKR and TUR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer