FLKR vs. SOXQ
FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLKR returned 48.97%/yr vs 59.09%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
FLKR vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 104.96% return, which is significantly higher than SOXQ's 92.48% return.
FLKR
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- 16.33%
- YTD
- 104.96%
- 6M
- 121.64%
- 1Y
- 213.10%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXQ
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- 24.08%
- YTD
- 92.48%
- 6M
- 89.00%
- 1Y
- 171.59%
- 3Y*
- 59.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 104.96% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -14.97% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 92.48% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLKR and SOXQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FLKR and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLKR vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLKR
SOXQ
Technology
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
FLKR
SOXQ
Industrials
FLKR
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
FLKR
SOXQ
Consumer Cyclical
FLKR
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
FLKR
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
FLKR
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
FLKR
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
FLKR
SOXQ
-
Energy
FLKR
SOXQ
-
Utilities
FLKR
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
FLKR
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLKR vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
FLKR
SOXQ
FLKR vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLKR | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.69 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.32 | 11.08 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.49 | 42.47 | -7.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLKR | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.18 | 5.11 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.96 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
FLKR vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLKR | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.06% | -46.01% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.03% | -15.59% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -39.36% | +12.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.10% | -2.15% | -3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.06% | -12.95% | -9.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.21% | 4.06% | +2.15% |
Volatility
FLKR vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 20.38% compared to Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) at 13.55%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLKR | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.38% | 13.55% | +6.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.87% | 26.81% | +10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.48% | 33.80% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.25% | 36.38% | -8.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 36.38% | -8.78% |
FLKR vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLKR vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.89% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLKR and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (20.38%) compared to SOXQ (13.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.09% vs 48.97% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SOXQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.09% return vs 48.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOXQ.
FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.19% for SOXQ.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs 5.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLKR and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer