FLKR vs. PPT

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and PPT (Putnam Premier Income Trust) are both funds - FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while PPT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Putnam Investments. FLKR is passively managed, while PPT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 19.64%/yr vs 2.15%/yr for PPT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FLKR vs. PPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 112.26% return, which is significantly higher than PPT's 0.81% return.

FLKR

• 1D: 7.15%
• 1M: 17.17%
• YTD: 112.26%
• 6M: 128.12%
• 1Y: 212.42%
• 3Y*: 49.62%
• 5Y*: 19.64%
• 10Y*: —

PPT

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 6M: 1.85%
• 1Y: 2.23%
• 3Y*: 7.60%
• 5Y*: 2.15%
• 10Y*: 4.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. PPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	112.26%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	3.00%
PPT Putnam Premier Income Trust	0.81%	8.39%	8.80%	7.43%	-7.75%	-1.72%	-6.54%	25.53%	-6.36%	0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and PPT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.19

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. PPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

PPT

PPT Risk / Return Rank: 5
PPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PPT Omega Ratio Rank: 4
PPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PPT Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. PPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLKR	PPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.63	0.18	+4.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	0.33	+3.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.04	+0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.29	0.33	+8.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.27	0.77	+31.50

FLKR vs. PPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is higher than the PPT Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and PPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. PPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, roughly equal to the maximum PPT drawdown of -49.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and PPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKR	PPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-49.76%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.03%	-5.05%	-17.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	-9.10%	-17.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.51%	-18.92%	-30.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.76%	-3.62%	+0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.02%	-11.23%	-10.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	2.18%	+4.43%

Volatility

FLKR vs. PPT - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 26.71% compared to Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT) at 2.25%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLKR	PPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.71%	2.25%	+24.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.52%	6.99%	+35.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.33%	9.36%	+36.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.77%	11.96%	+17.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.47%	14.45%	+14.02%

Dividends

FLKR vs. PPT - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than PPT's 9.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.82%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
PPT Putnam Premier Income Trust	9.07%	8.81%	8.76%	8.74%	8.60%	7.31%	8.84%	7.73%	6.84%	5.85%	6.28%	6.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKR and PPT in my portfolio?

FLKR and PPT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLKR or PPT?

FLKR has higher volatility (26.71%) compared to PPT (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs PPT's -49.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.